Add new intermediate boolean variables for each dependency and each dependency feature declared in a package.
This is used to simplify computation of the sat clauses.
Add support for multiple dependencies with the same name, if their kind or target is different.
A non-weak dependency feature for an optional dependency now activates a feature of the same name in the sat resolver.
This is to bring us into conformance with the [Rust crate ownership
policy](https://forge.rust-lang.org/policies/crate-ownership.html).
Items of note
- `cargo-credential-1password` is declared as Experimental as it is
intended for the community but I was unsure if we wanted to commit to
full support for it. In my mind, the ideal thing to do would be to
expatriate this to 1password.
- `home` is declared as Internal despite its wide use within the
ecosystem.
- `cargo-credential` is declared as Intentional as its an API intended
for the wider ecosystem and I didn't see a reason to declare it
experimental.
- `cargo-platform`, `cargo-util-schemas`, and `crates-io` are declared
as Intentional as they are both used internally and intended for
others to use for logic that integrates with cargo/registries.
I wondered about these being Experimental or Internal instead.
fix(add): Improve error when adding registry packages while vendored
### **What does this PR try to resolve?**
When a vendored directory is established, cargo add no longer adds new packages. Instead, it tries to translate a package name into a package that already exists in the vendored directory.
[More details](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/10729#issue-1260548746)
Since `@epage` has done most of the work, here I do the rest of the finishing work.
Improves the error from #10729
### **How should we test and review this PR?**
The implementation procedure is as follows:
https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/10729#issuecomment-1191633351
Test steps：
1. Try to get an arbitrary crate and execute `cargo vendor` command.
2. Configure the vendor directory in .cargo/config.toml.
3. Add `alter-registry` to the config.toml file.
```
[registries]
alter-registry= { index = "XXX" }
```
4. run the same `cargo add` command.
```
cargo add another-crate --registry alter-registry
```
Respect `package.rust-version` when generating lockfile, so that
a package with an old MSRV will never get an incompatible lockfile,
even when using the latest Cargo.
Users are still able to edit the `version` field in the lockfile
manually, if they intend to switch to a specific lockfile version.
I removed it from `cargo-test-support` and `cargo-test-macro`, despite
people depending on those (via git) because my long term plan is resting
on the `auto` value which won't affect git dependencies.
To implement rust-lang/rfcs#3516, we need to decouple the resolver's
behavior from the unstable flag. Since the code path is now dead, I
went ahead and removed it.
feat: Add `-Zmsrv-policy` feature flag
### What does this PR try to resolve?
Nothing noticeable....
The intent is to unblock experiments with different compatible MSRV policies like
- #9930
- #10653
- #10903
While I normally don't like PRs that do nothing on their own, this at least allows any one of those efforts to move forward with different people without juggling these base commits for whoever is first to include in their PR
While there isn't an RFC for this yet, this is intended to allow us to experiment to get a better idea of what we should put in an RFC. In some cases, we first do an eRFC for this but I assumed this wouldn't be needed in this case as this builds on rust-lang/rfcs#2495 and, I'm assuming, will be more surgical in nature
### How should we test and review this PR?
The `Summary` changes are largely untested as they will be mostly tested through the future work that builds on this PR. However, I wasn't too concerned about that because the code is relatively trivial.
### Additional information
I chose the name `msrv-policy` to distinguish this unstable feature from `rust-version`. Though those appear in different places (`Cargo.toml` vs `-Z`), I can see them being confusing which was especially apparent when editing `unstable.md` which has an anchor for `rust-version`.
This is a follow up to #12039.
This makes it easier for tools to report less irrelevant information.
I did both `publish = false` and `version = "0.0.0"` to help draw
attention to the fact that these crates are internal (inspired by a
matklad post).
I left `cargo-test-macro` and `cargo-test-support` in for my own
personal bias of one day wanting to see those crates published...
The only one removed that had previously been published was `mdman` but
seeing as that was a `0.0.0`, I'm assuming that was a mistake or just
reserving the name.
Before:
```console
$ cargo unpublished
name published current
==== ========= =======
cargo-platform 0.1.2 0.1.3
cargo-test-macro - 0.1.0
cargo-test-support - 0.1.0
cargo-util 0.2.3 0.2.4
crates-io 0.36.0 0.36.1
mdman 0.0.0 0.1.0
resolver-tests - 0.1.0
cargo 0.70.1 0.72.0
semver-check - 0.1.0
cargo-credential 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-1password 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-gnome-secret 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-macos-keychain 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-wincred 0.1.0 0.2.0
benchsuite - 0.1.0
```
After:
```console
name published current
==== ========= =======
cargo-platform 0.1.2 0.1.3
cargo-test-macro - 0.1.0
cargo-test-support - 0.1.0
cargo-util 0.2.3 0.2.4
crates-io 0.36.0 0.36.1
cargo 0.70.1 0.72.0
cargo-credential 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-1password 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-gnome-secret 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-macos-keychain 0.1.0 0.2.0
cargo-credential-wincred 0.1.0 0.2.0
```
