They are still nominally gzipped, but using `Compression::none()` makes
them consistent even across zlib and zlib-ng, and this fixes checksum
differences in the testsuite. There is a one-time update of all those
checksums to catch up with this change though.
This assumes that if any of the machine applicable fixes in
a diagnostic suggestion is a duplicate, we should see the
entire suggestion as a duplicate.
refactor(toml): Split out an explicit step to resolve `Cargo.toml`
### What does this PR try to resolve?
This builds on #13664 and #13666. Currently, once we have deserialized `Cargo.toml`, we pass it to a large machinery (`to_real_manifest`, `to_virtual_manifest`) so that
- `Cargo.toml` is resolved
- `Summary` is created
- `Manifest` is created
This splits out the resolving of `Cargo.toml` which is mostly workspace inheritance today.
While splitting logic conjoined like this can be a bit messy in the short term, the hope is that overall this makes the logic easier to follow (more condensed, focused sections to view; more explicit inputs/outputs).
In particular, I hope that this will make it clearer and easier to shift more logic into the resolving step, specifically the inferring of build targets for #13456.
### How should we test and review this PR?
This is broken up into very small steps in the hope that it makes it easier to analyze a step.
### Additional information
refactor(toml): Expose surce/spans for VirtualManifests
### What does this PR try to resolve?
This is a follow up to #13593, expanding support from `Manifest` to `VirtualManifest` as well.
This also does other clean up along the way in preparation for making a more explicit `resolve_toml` phase.
### How should we test and review this PR?
### Additional information
feat: Add 'open-namespaces' feature
### What does this PR try to resolve?
This is a step towards #13576
### How should we test and review this PR?
### Additional information
