This is to help with #9930
Example changes:
```diff
-[LOCKING] 4 packages
+[LOCKING] 4 packages to latest version
-[LOCKING] 2 packages
+[LOCKING] 2 packages to latest Rust 1.60.0 compatible versions
-[LOCKING] 2 packages
+[LOCKING] 2 packages to earliest versions
```
Benefits
- The package count is of "added" packages and this makes that more
logically clear
- This gives users transparency into what is happening, especially with
- what rust-version is use
- the transition to this feature in the new edition
- whether the planned config was applied or not (as I don't want it to
require an MSRV bump)
- Will make it easier in tests to show what changed
- Provides more motiviation to show this message in `cargo update` and
`cargo install` (that will be explored in a follow up PR)
This does come at the cost of more verbose output but hopefully not too
verbose. This is why I left off other factors, like avoid-dev-deps.
cargo: prevent dashes in lib.name
The TOML parser of Cargo currently refuses `lib.name` entries that contain dashes. Unfortunately, it uses the package-name as default if no explicit `lib.name` entry is specified. This package-name, however, can contain dashes.
Cargo documentation states that the package name is converted first, yet this was never implemented by the code-base.
Fix this inconsistency and convert the package name to a suitable crate-name first.
This fixes#12780. It is an alternative to #12640.
I've wanted something like this myself. I dislike using `--open`
because I tend to move up to re-run my `cargo doc` run but then have to
edit it to remove `--open`.
Also makes it annoying when opening docs when `cargo doc` is wrapped by
a tool like `make`.
This was previously attempted in #5592:
- Unlike the request in #5562, this aligns with #5592 in always printing
rather than using a flag as this seems generally useful
- Unlike #5592, this prints as an alternative to "Opening" to keep
things light
- Unlike #5592, this prints afterwards as the link is only valid then
Fixes#5562
The TOML parser of Cargo currently refuses `lib.name` entries that
contain dashes. Unfortunately, it uses the package-name as default if no
explicit `lib.name` entry is specified. This package-name, however, can
contain dashes.
Cargo documentation states that the package name is converted first, yet
this was never implemented by the code-base.
Fix this inconsistency and convert the package name to a suitable
crate-name first.
crates.io reads rust-version from the tarball directly, but we can include it in
the publish request for the sake of consistency for third-party registries.
Error message for transitive artifact dependencies with targets the package doesn't directly interact with
Address #11260. Produces an error message like described by `@weihanglo` [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/11260#issuecomment-1400455203):
```
error: could not find specification for target "x86_64-windows-msvc"
Dependency `bar v0.1.0` requires to build for target "x86_64-windows-msvc".
```
Note that this is not a complete fix for #11260.
`{ …, artifact = "bin", target = "target" }` should also be considered
to being built for `FeaturesFor::ArtifactDep` instead of `NormalOrDev`.
[This line][1] requests for `ArtifactDep` but [here][2] Cargo ignore
assumed host target of artifact dep.
Change it to explicit set host target triple when
- `{ …, target = "target" }`, and
- `--target` is not presented, meaning it would be build on host platform.
[1]: 1382b44e43/src/cargo/core/compiler/unit_dependencies.rs (L887)
[2]: 1382b44e43/src/cargo/core/resolver/features.rs (L857)
> Adapted from #11183
Previously, `is_dep_activated` depends on `activated_dependencies`,
which is a map of `PackageFeaturesKey` to its own activated `DepFeature`s.
`PackageFeaturesKey` in feature resolver is always comprised of
* A `PackageId` of a given dependency, and
* A enum value that helps decoupling activated features for that dependency.
Currently depending on the type of given dependency.
Looking into issue 10526, it has an `activated_dependencies` of
```
{
(mycrate, NormalOrDev) -> [dep:mybindep]
}
```
However, this [line][1] accidentally use a parent's `pkgid`
and a dependency's `FeaturesFor` to compose a key:
```
(mycrate, ArtifactDep("x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"))
```
That is never a valid key to query features for artifacts dependency.
A valid key should be comprised of components both from the parent:
```
(mycrate, NormalOrDev)
```
Or both from the dependency itself:
```
(mybindep, ArtifactDep("x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"))
```
This `unit_for` is from parent and should already contain its own
artifact dep information inside `artifact_target_for_features`,
so we don't need to map any dependency artifact from `dep.artifact()`.
[1]: a2ea66bea6/src/cargo/core/compiler/unit_dependencies.rs (L1106-L1107)
Previously, `is_dep_activated` depends on `activated_dependencies`,
which is a map of `PackageFeaturesKey` to its own activated `DepFeature`s.
`PackageFeaturesKey` in feature resolver is always comprised of
* A `PackageId` of a given dependency, and
* A enum value that helps decoupling activated features for that dependency.
Currently depending on the type of given dependency.
Looking into issue 10526, it has an `activated_dependencies` of
```
{
(mycrate, NormalOrDevOrArtifactTarget(None)) -> [dep:mybindep]
}
```
However, this [line][1] accidentally use a parent's `pkgid`
and a dependency's `FeaturesFor` to compose a key:
```
(mycrate, NormalOrDevOrArtifactTarget("x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"))
```
That is never a valid key to query features for artifacts dependency.
A valid key should be comprised of components both from the parent:
```
(mycrate, NormalOrDevOrArtifactTarget(None))
```
Or both from the dependency itself:
```
(mybindep, NormalOrDevOrArtifactTarget("x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"))
```
As aforementioned `activated_dependencies` only stores parent packages
and their activated features. Those informations are included in
`activated_features` as well, so this commit goes with the route that
removes `activated_dependencies` and uses only dependency's infomation
to query if itself is activated.
[1]: 0b84a35c2c/src/cargo/core/compiler/unit_dependencies.rs (L1097-L1098)
Originally, crates.io would block on publish requests until the publish
was complete, giving `cargo publish` this behavior by extension. When
crates.io switched to asynchronous publishing, this intermittently broke
people's workflows when publishing multiple crates. I say interittent
because it usually works until it doesn't and it is unclear why to the
end user because it will be published by the time they check. In the
end, callers tend to either put in timeouts (and pray), poll the
server's API, or use `crates-index` crate to poll the index.
This isn't sufficient because
- For any new interested party, this is a pit of failure they'll fall
into
- crates-index has re-implemented index support incorrectly in the past,
currently doesn't handle auth, doesn't support `git-cli`, etc.
- None of these previous options work if we were to implement
workspace-publish support (#1169)
- The new sparse registry might increase the publish times, making the
delay easier to hit manually
- The new sparse registry goes through CDNs so checking the server's API
might not be sufficient
- Once the sparse registry is available, crates-index users will find
out when the package is ready in git but it might not be ready through
the sparse registry because of CDNs
So now `cargo` will block until it sees the package in the index.
- This is checking via the index instead of server APIs in case there
are propagation delays. This has the side effect of being noisy
because of all of the "Updating index" messages.
- This is done unconditionally because cargo used to block and that
didn't seem to be a problem, blocking by default is the less error
prone case, and there doesn't seem to be enough justification for a
"don't block" flag.
The timeout was 5min but I dropped it to 1m. Unfortunately, I don't
have data from `cargo-release` to know what a reasonable timeout is, so
going ahead and dropping to 60s and assuming anything more is an outage.
Fixes#9507
In order not to give up and create a basis for discussion while ending
my 3h oddisey on finding a fix for today, I present something that
seems to work even though I hope there are better ways to solve this.
