From 276d6538db0aea0ac42717dd00dc6be55ec252af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: carson Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 08:41:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] clean up --- www/essays/a-response-to-rich-harris.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/essays/a-response-to-rich-harris.md b/www/essays/a-response-to-rich-harris.md index ed30288f..398d1553 100644 --- a/www/essays/a-response-to-rich-harris.md +++ b/www/essays/a-response-to-rich-harris.md @@ -157,8 +157,8 @@ driver that finally eliminates the remaining, scattered opposition to javascript We are not so sure about that. -To the contrary, we do not expect edge computing to figure in the majority of web applications for the foreseeable future. -Or, frankly, ever. CPU is cheap, network speeds are fast and increasing and microservices are a mess. Don't @ us. +To the contrary, we do not expect edge computing to figure in the majority of web applications for the foreseeable future. +Or, to be frank, ever. CPU is cheap, network speeds are fast and increasing and microservices are a mess. And, contra what Mr. Harris says, today the [trend is not obviously in javascripts favor](https://insights.stackoverflow.com/trends?tags=java%2Cc%2Cc%2B%2B%2Cpython%2Cc%23%2Cvb.net%2Cjavascript%2Cassembly%2Cphp%2Cperl%2Cruby%2Cvb%2Cswift%2Cr%2Cobjective-c). Five years ago, we, as founding members of the javascript resistance, were despairing of any hope of stopping the Javascript juggernaut. But then something