valtree performance tuning
Summary: This PR makes type checking of code with many type-level constants faster.
After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 was merged, we observed a small perf regression (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136318#issuecomment-2635562821). This happened because that PR introduced additional copies in the fast reject code path for consts, which is very hot for certain crates: 6c1d960d88/compiler/rustc_type_ir/src/fast_reject.rs (L486-L487)
This PR improves the performance again by properly interning the valtrees so that copying and comparing them becomes faster. This will become especially useful with `feature(adt_const_params)`, so the fast reject code doesn't have to do a deep compare of the valtrees.
Note that we can't just compare the interned consts themselves in the fast reject, because sometimes `'static` lifetimes in the type are be replaced with inference variables (due to canonicalization) on one side but not the other.
A less invasive alternative that I considered is simply avoiding copies introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136180 and comparing the valtrees it in-place (see commit: 9e91e50ac5 / perf results: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136593#issuecomment-2642303245), however that was still measurably slower than interning.
There are some minor regressions in secondary benchmarks: These happen due to changes in memory allocations and seem acceptable to me. The crates that make heavy use of valtrees show no significant changes in memory usage.
Fix cycle when debug-printing opaque types from RPITIT
Extend #66594 to opaque types from RPITIT.
Before this PR, enabling debug logging like `RUSTC_LOG="[check_type_bounds]"` for code containing RPITIT produces a query cycle of `explicit_item_bounds`, as pretty printing for opaque type calls [it](d9a4a47b8b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/print/pretty.rs (L1001)).
Mark condition/carry bit as clobbered in C-SKY inline assembly
C-SKY's compare and some arithmetic/logical instructions modify condition/carry bit (C) in PSR, but there is currently no way to mark it as clobbered in `asm!`.
This PR marks it as clobbered except when [`options(preserves_flags)`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/inline-assembly.html#r-asm.options.supported-options.preserves_flags) is used.
Refs:
- Section 1.3 "Programming model" and Section 1.3.5 "Condition/carry bit" in CSKY Architecture user_guide:
9f7121f7d4/CSKY%20Architecture%20user_guide.pdf
> Under user mode, condition/carry bit (C) is located in the lowest bit of PSR, and it can be
accessed and changed by common user instructions. It is the only data bit that can be visited
under user mode in PSR.
> Condition or carry bit represents the result after one operation. Condition/carry bit can be
clearly set according to the results of compare instructions or unclearly set as some
high-precision arithmetic or logical instructions. In addition, special instructions such as
DEC[GT,LT,NE] and XTRB[0-3] will influence the value of condition/carry bit.
- Register definition in LLVM:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/CSKY/CSKYRegisterInfo.td#L88
cc ```@Dirreke``` ([target maintainer](aa6f5ab18e/src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/csky-unknown-linux-gnuabiv2.md (target-maintainers)))
r? ```@Amanieu```
```@rustbot``` label +O-csky +A-inline-assembly
Cast allocas to default address space
Pointers for variables all need to be in the same address space for correct compilation. Therefore ensure that even if an `alloca` is created in a different address space, it is casted to the default address space before its value is used.
This is necessary for the amdgpu target and others where the default address space for `alloca`s is not 0.
For example the following code compiles incorrectly when not casting the address space to the default one:
```rust
fn f(p: *const i8 /* addrspace(0) */) -> *const i8 /* addrspace(0) */ {
let local = 0i8; /* addrspace(5) */
let res = if cond { p } else { &raw const local };
res
}
```
results in
```llvm
%local = alloca addrspace(5) i8
%res = alloca addrspace(5) ptr
if:
; Store 64-bit flat pointer
store ptr %p, ptr addrspace(5) %res
else:
; Store 32-bit scratch pointer
store ptr addrspace(5) %local, ptr addrspace(5) %res
ret:
; Load and return 64-bit flat pointer
%res.load = load ptr, ptr addrspace(5) %res
ret ptr %res.load
```
For amdgpu, `addrspace(0)` are 64-bit pointers, `addrspace(5)` are 32-bit pointers.
The above code may store a 32-bit pointer and read it back as a 64-bit pointer, which is obviously wrong and cannot work. Instead, we need to `addrspacecast %local to ptr addrspace(0)`, then we store and load the correct type.
Tracking issue: #135024
Stabilize target_feature_11
# Stabilization report
This is an updated version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116114, which is itself a redo of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99767. Most of this commit and report were copied from those PRs. Thanks ```@LeSeulArtichaut``` and ```@calebzulawski!```
## Summary
Allows for safe functions to be marked with `#[target_feature]` attributes.
Functions marked with `#[target_feature]` are generally considered as unsafe functions: they are unsafe to call, cannot *generally* be assigned to safe function pointers, and don't implement the `Fn*` traits.
However, calling them from other `#[target_feature]` functions with a superset of features is safe.
```rust
// Demonstration function
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn avx2() {}
fn foo() {
// Calling `avx2` here is unsafe, as we must ensure
// that AVX is available first.
unsafe {
avx2();
}
}
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn bar() {
// Calling `avx2` here is safe.
avx2();
}
```
Moreover, once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135504 is merged, they can be converted to safe function pointers in a context in which calling them is safe:
```rust
// Demonstration function
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn avx2() {}
fn foo() -> fn() {
// Converting `avx2` to fn() is a compilation error here.
avx2
}
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn bar() -> fn() {
// `avx2` coerces to fn() here
avx2
}
```
See the section "Closures" below for justification of this behaviour.
## Test cases
Tests for this feature can be found in [`tests/ui/target_feature/`](f6cb952dc1/tests/ui/target-feature).
## Edge cases
### Closures
* [target-feature 1.1: should closures inherit target-feature annotations? #73631](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73631)
Closures defined inside functions marked with #[target_feature] inherit the target features of their parent function. They can still be assigned to safe function pointers and implement the appropriate `Fn*` traits.
```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn qux() {
let my_closure = || avx2(); // this call to `avx2` is safe
let f: fn() = my_closure;
}
```
This means that in order to call a function with #[target_feature], you must guarantee that the target-feature is available while the function, any closures defined inside it, as well as any safe function pointers obtained from target-feature functions inside it, execute.
This is usually ensured because target features are assumed to never disappear, and:
- on any unsafe call to a `#[target_feature]` function, presence of the target feature is guaranteed by the programmer through the safety requirements of the unsafe call.
- on any safe call, this is guaranteed recursively by the caller.
If you work in an environment where target features can be disabled, it is your responsibility to ensure that no code inside a target feature function (including inside a closure) runs after this (until the feature is enabled again).
**Note:** this has an effect on existing code, as nowadays closures do not inherit features from the enclosing function, and thus this strengthens a safety requirement. It was originally proposed in #73631 to solve this by adding a new type of UB: “taking a target feature away from your process after having run code that uses that target feature is UB” .
This was motivated by userspace code already assuming in a few places that CPU features never disappear from a program during execution (see i.e. 2e29bdf908/crates/std_detect/src/detect/arch/x86.rs); however, concerns were raised in the context of the Linux kernel; thus, we propose to relax that requirement to "causing the set of usable features to be reduced is unsafe; when doing so, the programmer is required to ensure that no closures or safe fn pointers that use removed features are still in scope".
* [Fix #[inline(always)] on closures with target feature 1.1 #111836](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111836)
Closures accept `#[inline(always)]`, even within functions marked with `#[target_feature]`. Since these attributes conflict, `#[inline(always)]` wins out to maintain compatibility.
### ABI concerns
* [The extern "C" ABI of SIMD vector types depends on target features #116558](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558)
The ABI of some types can change when compiling a function with different target features. This could have introduced unsoundness with target_feature_11, but recent fixes (#133102, #132173) either make those situations invalid or make the ABI no longer dependent on features. Thus, those issues should no longer occur.
### Special functions
The `#[target_feature]` attribute is forbidden from a variety of special functions, such as main, current and future lang items (e.g. `#[start]`, `#[panic_handler]`), safe default trait implementations and safe trait methods.
This was not disallowed at the time of the first stabilization PR for target_features_11, and resulted in the following issues/PRs:
* [`#[target_feature]` is allowed on `main` #108645](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108645)
* [`#[target_feature]` is allowed on default implementations #108646](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108646)
* [#[target_feature] is allowed on #[panic_handler] with target_feature 1.1 #109411](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109411)
* [Prevent using `#[target_feature]` on lang item functions #115910](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115910)
## Documentation
* Reference: [Document the `target_feature_11` feature reference#1181](https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1181)
---
cc tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69098
cc ```@workingjubilee```
cc ```@RalfJung```
r? ```@rust-lang/lang```
Rename rustc_middle::Ty::is_unsafe_ptr to is_raw_ptr
The wording unsafe pointer is less common and not mentioned in a lot of places, instead this is usually called a "raw pointer". For the sake of uniformity, we rename this method.
This came up during the review of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134424.
r? `@Noratrieb`
