fix: In completion's expand, consider recursion stop condition (when we're not inside a macro call anymore) *after* the recursive call instead of before it
This is because our detection is imperfect, and miss some cases such as an impersonating `test` macro, so we hope we'll expand successfully in this case.
Fix tests on LLVM 20
For sparcv8plus.rs, duplicate the test for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. LLVM 20 resolves one of the FIXME in the test.
For x86_64-bigint-add.rs split the check lines for LLVM 19 and LLVM 20. The difference in codegen here is due to a difference in unroll factor, which I believe is not what the test is interested in.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132957.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133754.
Get rid of `mir::Const::from_ty_const`
This function is strange, because it turns valtrees into `mir::Const::Value`, but the rest of the const variants stay as type system consts.
All of the callsites except for one in `instsimplify` (array length simplification of `ptr_metadata` call) just go through the valtree arm of the function, so it's easier to just create a `mir::Const` directly for those.
For the instsimplify case, if we have a type system const we should *keep* having a type system const, rather than turning it into a `mir::Const::Value`; it doesn't really matter in practice, though, bc `usize` has no padding, but it feels more principled.
Split manual.adoc into markdown files, one for each chapter.
For the parts of the manual that are generated from source code doc
comments, update the comments to use markdown syntax and update the
code generators to write to `generated.md` files.
For the weekly release, stop copying the .adoc files to the
`rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer.github.io` at release time. Instead,
we'll sync the manual hourly from this repository.
See https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer.github.io/pull/226
for the sync. This PR should be merged first, and that PR needs to be
merged before the next weekly release.
This change is based on #15795, but rebased and updated. I've also
manually checked each page for markdown syntax issues and fixed any I
encountered.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Josh Rotenberg <joshrotenberg@gmail.com>
Previously, we'd suggest a type of `vec` for a value of type `Vec<T>`,
which is rarely what the user wants. We also had no suggestions for
values of type `&[T]`.
Instead, try to pluralise the inner type name, and fall back to
`items`.
