And add a new diagnostic for non-`Fn` parenthesized generic args.
Path lowering started to look like a mess, with each function carrying additional parameters for the diagnostic callback (since paths can occur both in type and in expression/pattern position, and their diagnostic handling is different) and the segment index, for the diagnostics report. So I refactored it from stateless functions on `TyLoweringContext` into stateful struct, `PathLoweringContext`, that tracks the process of lowering a path from resolution til assoc types selection.
This is not documented (and I discovered that from experimenting and looking at the compiler's source code), but cfg_attrs *on the same level* as the attribute macro should be processed before it is expanded. cfg_attrs *below* should not (and this is contrary to what happens with derive macros, where both should be processed).
More correctly, *also* per-token. Because as it turns out, while the top-level edition affects parsing (I think), the per-token edition affects escaping of identifiers/keywords.
I expected this to be faster (due to less allocations and better cache locality), but benchmarked it is not (neither it is slower). Memory usage, however, drops by ~50mb (of `analysis-stats .`). I guess tt construction is just not hot.
This also simplifies using even less memory for token trees by compressing equal span, which I plan to do right after.
Some workflows are more easily expressed with a flat tt, while some are better expressed with a tree. With the right helpers, though (which was mostly a matter of trial and error), even the worst workflows become very easy indeed.
Which caused the macros of the popular `tracing` crate to not offer completions.
The reason is rather complicated: it boils down to macro ignoring their input and completion always choosing the first expansion.
The diagnostic implemented is a simple one (E0109). It serves as a test for the new foundation.
This commit only implements diagnostics for type in bodies and body-carrying signatures; the next commit will include diagnostics in the rest of the things.
Also fix one weird bug that was detected when implementing this that caused `Fn::(A, B) -> C` (which is a valid, if bizarre, alternative syntax to `Fn(A, B) -> C` to lower incorrectly.
And also fix a maybe-bug where parentheses were sneaked into a code string needlessly; this was not detected until now because the parentheses were removed (by the make-AST family API), but with a change in this commit they are now inserted. So fix that too.
Or macro_rules hygiene, or mixed site hygiene. In other words, hygiene for variables and labels but not items.
The realization that made me implement this was that while "full" hygiene (aka. def site hygiene) is really hard for us to implement, and will likely involve intrusive changes and performance losses, since every `Name` will have to carry hygiene, mixed site hygiene is very local: it applies only to bodies, and we very well can save it in a side map with minor losses.
This fixes one diagnostic in r-a that was about `izip!()` using hygiene (yay!) but it introduces a huge number of others, because of #18262. Up until now this issue wasn't a major problem because it only affected few cases, but with hygiene identifiers referred by macros like that are not resolved at all. The next commit will fix that.
