A4-Tacks 891391a6e5
Improve parsing of missing name in MethodCallExpr
Usually, this occurs when preparing to input a method name

However, once an identifier is entered, it is not reasonable for the parsing result to change from `CallExpr(FieldExpr())` to `MethodCallExpr()`

Example
---
```rust
fn foo() {
    x.
    ()
}
```

**Before this PR**:

```text
SOURCE_FILE
  FN
    FN_KW "fn"
    WHITESPACE " "
    NAME
      IDENT "foo"
    PARAM_LIST
      L_PAREN "("
      R_PAREN ")"
    WHITESPACE " "
    BLOCK_EXPR
      STMT_LIST
        L_CURLY "{"
        WHITESPACE "\n    "
        CALL_EXPR
          FIELD_EXPR
            PATH_EXPR
              PATH
                PATH_SEGMENT
                  NAME_REF
                    IDENT "x"
            DOT "."
          WHITESPACE "\n    "
          ARG_LIST
            L_PAREN "("
            R_PAREN ")"
        WHITESPACE "\n"
        R_CURLY "}"
  WHITESPACE "\n"
error 17: expected field name or number
```

**After this PR**:

```text
SOURCE_FILE
  FN
    FN_KW "fn"
    WHITESPACE " "
    NAME
      IDENT "foo"
    PARAM_LIST
      L_PAREN "("
      R_PAREN ")"
    WHITESPACE " "
    BLOCK_EXPR
      STMT_LIST
        L_CURLY "{"
        WHITESPACE "\n    "
        METHOD_CALL_EXPR
          PATH_EXPR
            PATH
              PATH_SEGMENT
                NAME_REF
                  IDENT "x"
          DOT "."
          WHITESPACE "\n    "
          ARG_LIST
            L_PAREN "("
            R_PAREN ")"
        WHITESPACE "\n"
        R_CURLY "}"
  WHITESPACE "\n"
error 17: expected method name, field name or number
```
2025-10-22 14:37:12 +08:00
..