update to literal-escaper-0.0.5
Quoting from the changelog, this version brings:
- Use `NonZero<char/u8>` in `unescape_c_str` and `check_raw_c_str` to statically exclude nuls
- Add `#[inline]` to small functions for improved performance
update `cfg_select!` documentation
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115585
After rust-lang/rust#143461, and with an eye on a soon(ish) stabilization, I think the docs need some work.
The existing text read more like a motivation for the feature existing to me, so I've tried to now be a bit more descriptive. Still, suggestions are very welcome.
I also added a test for an empty `select! {}` because it's just the sort of thing that might break.
r? ``@traviscross``
make `cfg_select` a builtin macro
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115585
This parses mostly the same as the `macro cfg_select` version, except:
1. wrapping in double brackets is no longer supported (or needed): `cfg_select {{ /* ... */ }}` is now rejected.
2. in an expression context, the rhs is no longer wrapped in a block, so that this now works:
```rust
fn main() {
println!(cfg_select! {
unix => { "foo" }
_ => { "bar" }
});
}
```
3. a single wildcard rule is now supported: `cfg_select { _ => 1 }` now works
I've also added an error if none of the rules evaluate to true, and warnings for any arms that follow the `_` wildcard rule.
cc `@traviscross` if I'm missing any feature that should/should not be included
r? `@petrochenkov` for the macro logic details
Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system
Part of rust-lang/rust#131229
This ports:
- `#[const_trait]`
- `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]`
- `#[rustc_do_not_implement_via_object]`
- `#[rustc_coinductive]`
- `#[type_const]`
- `#[rustc_specialization_trait]`
- `#[rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker]`
- `#[marker]`
- `#[fundamental]`
- `#[rustc_paren_sugar]`
- `#[rustc_allow_incoherent_impl]`
- `#[rustc_coherence_is_core]`
This also changes `#[marker]` to error on duplicates instead of warning.
cc rust-lang/rust#142838, but I don't think it matters too much, since it's unstable.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Port several linking (linkage?) related attributes the new attribute system
This ports:
- `#[export_stable]`
- `#[ffi_const]`
- `#[ffi_pure]`
- `#[rustc_std_internal_symbol]`
Part of rust-lang/rust#131229
r? ``@oli-obk``
const-block-as-pattern: do not refer to no-longer-existing nightly feature
Surely everyone who used this nightly feature has fixed their code by now. So let's not confused people on stable that try to use a const block as a pattern by referring to some dead nightly feature.
compiler: rename BareFn to FnPtr
At some point "BareFn" was the chosen name for a "bare" function, without the niceties of `~fn`, `&fn`, or a few other ways of writing a function type. However, at some point the syntax for a "bare function" and any other function diverged even more. We started calling them what they are: function pointers, denoted by their own syntax.
However, we never changed the *internal* name for these, as this divergence was very gradual. Personally, I have repeatedly searched for "FnPtr" and gotten confused until I find the name is BareFn, only to forget this until the next time, since I don't routinely interact with the higher-level AST and HIR. But even tools that interact with these internal types only touch on them in a few places, making a migration easy enough. Let's use a more intuitive and obvious name, as this 12+ year old name has little to do with current Rust.
Fix some comments and related types and locals where it is obvious, e.g.
- bare_fn -> fn_ptr
- LifetimeBinderKind::BareFnType -> LifetimeBinderKind::FnPtrType
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <me@fmease.dev>
