On unused binding or binding not present in all patterns, suggest potential typo of unit struct/variant or const
When encountering an or-pattern with a binding not available in all patterns, look for consts and unit struct/variants that have similar names as the binding to detect typos.
```
error[E0408]: variable `Ban` is not bound in all patterns
--> $DIR/binding-typo.rs:22:9
|
LL | (Foo, _) | (Ban, Foo) => {}
| ^^^^^^^^ --- variable not in all patterns
| |
| pattern doesn't bind `Ban`
|
help: you might have meant to use the similarly named unit variant `Bar`
|
LL - (Foo, _) | (Ban, Foo) => {}
LL + (Foo, _) | (Bar, Foo) => {}
|
```
For items that are not in the immedate scope, suggest the full path for them:
```
error[E0408]: variable `Non` is not bound in all patterns
--> $DIR/binding-typo-2.rs:51:16
|
LL | (Non | Some(_))=> {}
| --- ^^^^^^^ pattern doesn't bind `Non`
| |
| variable not in all patterns
|
help: you might have meant to use the similarly named unit variant `None`
|
LL - (Non | Some(_))=> {}
LL + (core::option::Option::None | Some(_))=> {}
|
```
When encountering a typo in a pattern that gets interpreted as an unused binding, look for unit struct/variant of the same type as the binding:
```
error: unused variable: `Non`
--> $DIR/binding-typo-2.rs:36:9
|
LL | Non => {}
| ^^^
|
help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore
|
LL | _Non => {}
| +
help: you might have meant to pattern match on the similarly named variant `None`
|
LL - Non => {}
LL + std::prelude::v1::None => {}
|
```
Suggest constant on unused binding in a pattern
```
error: unused variable: `Batery`
--> $DIR/binding-typo-2.rs:110:9
|
LL | Batery => {}
| ^^^^^^
|
help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore
|
LL | _Batery => {}
| +
help: you might have meant to pattern match on the similarly named constant `Battery`
|
LL | Battery => {}
| +
```
Fixrust-lang/rust#51976.
add span to struct pattern rest (..)
Struct pattern rest (`..`) did not retain span information compared to normal fields. This patch adds span information for it.
The motivation of this patch comes from when I implemented this PR for Clippy: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/15000#discussion_r2134145163
It is possible to get the span of the Et cetera in a bit roundabout way, but I thought this would be nicer.
This was done in #145740 and #145947. It is causing problems for people
using r-a on anything that uses the rustc-dev rustup package, e.g. Miri,
clippy.
This repository has lots of submodules and subtrees and various
different projects are carved out of pieces of it. It seems like
`[workspace.dependencies]` will just be more trouble than it's worth.
```
error: unused variable: `Batery`
--> $DIR/binding-typo-2.rs:110:9
|
LL | Batery => {}
| ^^^^^^
|
help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore
|
LL | _Batery => {}
| +
help: you might have meant to pattern match on the similarly named constant `Battery`
|
LL | Battery => {}
| +
```
When encountering a typo in a pattern that gets interpreted as an unused binding, look for unit struct/variant of the same type as the binding:
```
error: unused variable: `Non`
--> $DIR/binding-typo-2.rs:36:9
|
LL | Non => {}
| ^^^
|
help: if this is intentional, prefix it with an underscore
|
LL | _Non => {}
| +
help: you might have meant to pattern match on the similarly named variant `None`
|
LL - Non => {}
LL + std::prelude::v1::None => {}
|
```
Add new `doc(attribute = "...")` attribute
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141123.
The implementation and purpose of this new `#[doc(attribute = "...")]` attribute is very close to `#[doc(keyword = "...")]`. Which means that luckily for us, most of the code needed was already in place and `@Noratrieb` nicely wrote a first draft that helped me implement this new attribute very fast.
Now with all this said, there is one thing I didn't do yet: adding a `rustdoc-js-std` test. I added GUI tests with search results for attributes so should be fine but I still plan on adding one for it once documentation for builtin attributes will be written into the core/std libs.
You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/doc-attribute-attribute/foo/index.html).
cc `@Noratrieb` `@Veykril`
Port must_use to the new target checking
This PR ports `must_use` to the new target checking logic
This also adds a tool-only suggestion to remove attributes on invalid targets, as to not immediately undo the work of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145274
r? `@jdonszelmann`
Remove the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute in favor of `#[sanitize(xyz = "on|off")]`
This came up during the sanitizer stabilization (rust-lang/rust#123617). Instead of a `#[no_sanitize(xyz)]` attribute, we would like to have a `#[sanitize(xyz = "on|off")]` attribute, which is more powerful and allows to be extended in the future (instead
of just focusing on turning sanitizers off). The implementation is done according to what was [discussed on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/343119-project-exploit-mitigations/topic/Stabilize.20the.20.60no_sanitize.60.20attribute/with/495377292)).
The new attribute also works on modules, traits and impl items and thus enables usage as the following:
```rust
#[sanitize(address = "off")]
mod foo {
fn unsanitized(..) {}
#[sanitize(address = "on")]
fn sanitized(..) {}
}
trait MyTrait {
#[sanitize(address = "off")]
fn unsanitized_default(..) {}
}
#[sanitize(thread = "off")]
impl MyTrait for () {
...
}
```
r? ```@rcvalle```
This removes the #[no_sanitize] attribute, which was behind an unstable
feature named no_sanitize. Instead, we introduce the sanitize attribute
which is more powerful and allows to be extended in the future (instead
of just focusing on turning sanitizers off).
This also makes sanitize(kernel_address = ..) attribute work with
-Zsanitize=address
To do it the same as how clang disables address sanitizer, we now
disable ASAN on sanitize(kernel_address = "off") and KASAN on
sanitize(address = "off").
The same was added to clang in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44981.
This change implements the #[sanitize(..)] attribute, which opts to
replace the currently unstable #[no_sanitize]. Essentially the new
attribute works similar as #[no_sanitize], just with more flexible
options regarding where it is applied. E.g. it is possible to turn
a certain sanitizer either on or off:
`#[sanitize(address = "on|off")]`
This attribute now also applies to more places, e.g. it is possible
to turn off a sanitizer for an entire module or impl block:
```rust
\#[sanitize(address = "off")]
mod foo {
fn unsanitized(..) {}
#[sanitize(address = "on")]
fn sanitized(..) {}
}
\#[sanitize(thread = "off")]
impl MyTrait for () {
...
}
```
This attribute is enabled behind the unstable `sanitize` feature.
- Added a few more variants which are needed for various attributes
- Previously a trait method with default block had the same target representation as a method in a `impl trait for` block, this has been changed (See `MethodKind`)
- Added `plural_name` for more precision on the form of the name
Make no_mangle on foreign items explicit instead of implicit
for a followup PR I'm working on I need some foreign items to mangle. I could add a new attribute: `no_no_mangle` or something silly like that but by explicitly putting `no_mangle` in the codegen fn attrs of foreign items we can default it to `no_mangle` and then easily remove it when we don't want it.
I guess you'd know about this r? `@bjorn3.` Shouldn't be too hard to review :)
Builds on rust-lang/rust#144655 which should merge first.
fix: re-enable self-assignment
## Description
Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`.
## History
The original regressions (rust-lang/rust#81626, rust-lang/rust#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand.
- Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang/rust#87129 to address rust-lang/rust#75356
- The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang/rust#81473's "write-only fields" detection
- rust-lang/rust#81473 was reverted via rust-lang/rust#86212 and rust-lang/rust#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang/rust#81626, rust-lang/rust#81658)
- The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems
This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis.
## Changes
- Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file
- `handle_assign` and
- `check_for_self_assign`
- Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods
- Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
Port `#[allow_internal_unsafe]` to the new attribute system (attempt 2)
This is a slightly modified version of ae1487aa9922de7642c448cc0908584026699e1c, which caused a performance regression (reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145086#issue-3303428759). The diff between this PR and the previous one can be seen in 027a1def.
r? ```````@jdonszelmann``````` 💖
Implement `stability_implications` without a visitor.
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143845, the `Annotator` visitor was a no-op when the crate is not staged_api. This PR avoids using a visitor altogether, making `stability_implications` truly a no-op in most cases.
