itsscb/rust
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git synced 2025-11-04 06:56:14 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
206,213 Commits 10 Branches 150 Tags
Commit Graph

176 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pietro Albini
3975d55d98
remove cfg(bootstrap) 2022-09-26 10:14:45 +02:00
Takayuki Maeda
8fe936099a separate definitions and HIR owners 
fix a ui test

use `into`

fix clippy ui test

fix a run-make-fulldeps test

implement `IntoQueryParam<DefId>` for `OwnerId`

use `OwnerId` for more queries

change the type of `ParentOwnerIterator::Item` to `(OwnerId, OwnerNode)`
 2022-09-24 23:21:19 +09:00
b-naber
a705e65605 rename Unevaluated to UnevaluatedConst 2022-09-23 14:27:34 +02:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5f91719f75 UPDATE - rename SessionSubdiagnostic macro to Subdiagnostic 
Also renames:
- sym::AddSubdiagnostic to sym:: Subdiagnostic
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AddSubdiagnostic" to rustc_diagnostic_item = "Subdiagnostic"
 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
a3396b2070 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler macro to Diagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
19b348fed4 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler trait to IntoDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
lcnr
647052fc04 remove the Subst trait, always use EarlyBinder 2022-09-19 11:37:27 +02:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett 
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687895731e12f4a2651e8d70acd08872d (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc330f34213812ad65cae86ced90d80c (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a4477a76bfd18fdcd8f45a939cbed82d34 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963ce95ef4f7d4a81784bb5002ccf63c93 (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c1775f0103a1ebee6ab7c6d9b781a21:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d3075471b3867428788c49f54fffe53f52 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984fda7faa156d1c9cf91aa4934f0e00f (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a27de1b08a0b95592dc8ec93bf0a321a (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea56667703ac06689ff1d6fba5d170fa7392a7 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d8cbcff7d1d14bb34e38fe6fe7c233e (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded8674b89c46052da92399227c3b764c6a (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b566401068cb8450912f6ab48f3d0e60f5cb482 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57120ec1411196214fd0d1c33fb18bf6 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7b8a1c4eee7e065b8cef38ea629a6a3 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c969ed2edd12c674ca05c1baf867f6f6f (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d040b5ee0bc79e6e7f01772adce791b (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c531d52f701b870bb27b45668a44d52 (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a8493b40a557394325a3a713b6528de60 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603ca8b83b9d06e56f74e10e3d410553ff (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d4092045728c1c68282769d555706f273 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d0cf2097a5fdc0bb710442d0f2e7876 (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
 2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
bors
c524c7dd25 Auto merge of #98588 - b-naber:valtrees-cleanup, r=lcnr 
Use only ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system

r? `@lcnr`
 2022-09-17 03:04:22 +00:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap 
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
 2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
b-naber
29c0364c37 rebase 2022-09-13 17:48:05 +02:00
Eric Holk
6c01273a15 Plumb dyn trait representation through ty::Dynamic 2022-09-12 16:55:55 -07:00
bors
3194958217 Auto merge of #100251 - compiler-errors:tuple-trait-2, r=jackh726 
Implement `std::marker::Tuple`

Split out from #99943 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99943#pullrequestreview-1064459183).

Implements part of rust-lang/compiler-team#537
r? `@jackh726`
 2022-09-12 03:24:29 +00:00
Andrew Cann
22f4bbb20f Apply formatting fixes 2022-09-11 14:04:16 +08:00
Andrew Cann
2c0bc9444e implement Copy/Clone for generators 2022-09-11 13:50:35 +08:00
lcnr
c63020a7c3 rename codegen_fulfill_obligation 2022-09-09 13:36:27 +02:00
lcnr
14f2acd0ac resolve_instance: remove BoundVarsCollector 2022-09-09 13:08:07 +02:00
Michael Goulet
78b962a4f3 RPITIT placeholder items 2022-09-09 01:31:44 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
2c4c8eb1a3 Box PatKind::Range. 
Because it's the biggest variant. Also, make `PatRange` non-`Copy`,
because it's 104 bytes, which is pretty big.
 2022-09-02 07:26:22 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
053874eecc Clean up THIR patterns. 
`thir::Pat::kind` is a `Box<PatKind>`, which doesn't follow the usual
pattern in AST/HIR/THIR which is that the "kind" enum for a node is
stored inline within the parent struct.

This commit makes the `PatKind` directly inline within the `Pat`. This
requires using `Box<Pat>` in all the types that hold a `Pat.

Ideally, `Pat` would be stored in `Thir` like `Expr` and `Stmt` and
referred to with a `PatId` rather than `Box<Pat>`. But this is hard to
do because lots of `Pat`s get created after the destruction of the `Cx`
that does normal THIR building. But this does get us a step closer to
`PatId`, because all the `Box<Pat>` occurrences would be replaced with
`PatId` if `PatId` ever happened.

At 128 bytes, `Pat` is large. Subsequent commits will shrink it.
 2022-09-02 07:26:17 +10:00
Oli Scherer
1fc9ef1edd tracing::instrument cleanup 2022-09-01 14:54:27 +00:00
Oli Scherer
ee3c835018 Always import all tracing macros for the entire crate instead of piecemeal by module 2022-09-01 14:54:27 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
d182081de1
Rollup merge of #99027 - tmiasko:basic-blocks, r=oli-obk 
Replace `Body::basic_blocks()` with field access

Since the refactoring in #98930, it is possible to borrow the basic blocks
independently from other parts of MIR by accessing the `basic_blocks` field
directly.

Replace unnecessary `Body::basic_blocks()` method with a direct field access,
which has an additional benefit of borrowing the basic blocks only.
 2022-08-29 06:34:43 +02:00
Peter Medus
01c1616b25 Migrate rustc_ty_utils to use SessionDiagnostic 2022-08-26 14:36:51 +01:00
Tomasz Miąsko
b48870b451 Replace Body::basic_blocks() with field access 2022-08-26 14:27:08 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
2df805fc7a Store blocks in Thir. 
Like expressions, statements, and match arms. This shrinks `thir::Stmt`
and is a precursor to further shrinking `thir::Expr`.
 2022-08-24 15:06:44 +10:00
lcnr
4fe666ee64 implied_bounds: clarify our assumptions 2022-08-17 12:22:32 +02:00
Michael Goulet
d0e4c679ff Built-in implementation of Tuple trait 2022-08-07 16:31:03 -07:00
Jack Huey
955fcad758 Add bound_impl_subject and bound_return_ty 2022-08-03 01:02:46 -04:00
Jack Huey
96a69dce2c Change sized_constraints to return EarlyBinder 2022-08-03 00:14:24 -04:00
Camille GILLOT
957548183d Remove trait_of_item query. 2022-08-01 21:39:26 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
d7ea161b7e Remove DefId from AssocItemContainer. 2022-08-01 21:38:45 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
8ee4446ee5 Remove visibility from AssocItem. 2022-08-01 21:38:20 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
110f0656cb Store associated item defaultness in impl_defaultness. 2022-08-01 21:38:16 +02:00
Miguel Guarniz
16513d689e Rename local_did to def_id 
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
 2022-07-29 18:26:10 -04:00
Miguel Guarniz
25bdc8965e Change maybe_body_owned_by to take local def id 
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
 2022-07-29 18:25:58 -04:00
Michael Goulet
22b2aae737 Do not resolve associated const when there is no provided value 2022-07-22 18:58:07 +00:00
Michael Woerister
88f6c6d8a0 Remove unused StableMap and StableSet types from rustc_data_structures 2022-07-20 13:11:39 +02:00
Dylan DPC
ecae3d74e2
Rollup merge of #99000 - JulianKnodt:allow_resolve_no_substs, r=lcnr 
Move abstract const to middle

Moves AbstractConst (and all associated methods) to rustc middle for use in `rustc_infer`.
This allows for const resolution in infer to use abstract consts to walk consts and check if
they are resolvable.

This attempts to resolve the issue where `Foo<{ concrete const }, generic T>` is incorrectly marked as conflicting, and is independent from the other issue where nested abstract consts must be resolved.

r? `@lcnr`
 2022-07-14 19:24:04 +05:30
kadmin
20fb8aba8f Fix overlapping impls 2022-07-14 09:01:17 +00:00
Joshua Nelson
3c9765cff1 Rename debugging_opts to unstable_opts 
This is no longer used only for debugging options (e.g. `-Zoutput-width`, `-Zallow-features`).
Rename it to be more clear.
 2022-07-13 17:47:06 -05:00
kadmin
e612e2603c Move abstract const to rustc_middle::ty 2022-07-12 02:21:31 +00:00
Alan Egerton
4f0a64736b
Update TypeVisitor paths 2022-07-06 06:41:53 +01:00
Alan Egerton
e9e5d0685b
Relax constrained generics to TypeVisitable 2022-07-05 22:25:43 +01:00
lcnr
24799e3720 remove an unused DefId 2022-07-04 14:35:19 +02:00
Camille GILLOT
0161ecd13f Recover when failing to normalize closure signature. 2022-06-30 21:45:29 +02:00
Dominik Stolz
d048b15216 Improve doc comment of destructure_const 2022-06-29 10:30:47 +02:00
Dominik Stolz
053f48d91f Address code review comments 2022-06-28 23:26:54 +02:00
Dominik Stolz
080525229b Make consts mod private 2022-06-28 22:45:05 +02:00
Dominik Stolz
cd88bb332c Improve pretty printing of valtrees for references 2022-06-28 22:38:32 +02:00