257 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Josh Triplett
6bff1abf9d mbe: Support unsafe attribute rules 2025-10-01 16:19:39 -07:00
Matthias Krüger
ba93a4f674
Rollup merge of #146849 - joshtriplett:macro-reduce-legacy-bang, r=petrochenkov
Reduce some uses of `LegacyBang`

- **Switch `dummy_bang` from `LegacyBang` to `Bang`**
- **mbe: Switch dummy extension used for errors from `LegacyBang` to `Bang`**
2025-09-26 18:11:12 +02:00
Josh Triplett
e99e226748 Switch dummy_bang from LegacyBang to Bang 2025-09-22 00:41:22 +08:00
Jonathan Brouwer
6abcadc235
Port #[macro_export] to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Co-authored-by: Anne Stijns <anstijns@gmail.com>
2025-09-21 10:42:47 -04:00
Jana Dönszelmann
6087d89004
fixup limit handling code 2025-09-08 15:07:12 -07:00
Josh Triplett
c99320156d Refactor lint buffering to avoid requiring a giant enum
Lint buffering currently relies on a giant enum `BuiltinLintDiag`
containing all the lints that might potentially get buffered. In
addition to being an unwieldy enum in a central crate, this also makes
`rustc_lint_defs` a build bottleneck: it depends on various types from
various crates (with a steady pressure to add more), and many crates
depend on it.

Having all of these variants in a separate crate also prevents detecting
when a variant becomes unused, which we can do with a dedicated type
defined and used in the same crate.

Refactor this to use a dyn trait, to allow using `LintDiagnostic` types
directly.

This requires boxing, but all of this is already on the slow path
(emitting an error).

Because the existing `BuiltinLintDiag` requires some additional types in
order to decorate some variants, which are only available later in
`rustc_lint`, use an enum `DecorateDiagCompat` to handle both the `dyn
LintDiagnostic` case and the `BuiltinLintDiag` case.
2025-08-22 01:59:56 -07:00
Guillaume Gomez
bd6fb63596
Rollup merge of #145153 - joshtriplett:macro-kinds-plural, r=petrochenkov
Handle macros with multiple kinds, and improve errors

(I recommend reviewing this commit-by-commit.)

Switch to a bitflags `MacroKinds` to support macros with more than one kind

Review everything that uses `MacroKind`, and switch anything that could refer to more than one kind to use `MacroKinds`.

Add a new `SyntaxExtensionKind::MacroRules` for `macro_rules!` macros, using the concrete `MacroRulesMacroExpander` type, and have it track which kinds it can handle. Eliminate the separate optional `attr_ext`, now that a `SyntaxExtension` can handle multiple macro kinds.

This also avoids the need to downcast when calling methods on `MacroRulesMacroExpander`, such as `get_unused_rule`.

Integrate macro kind checking into name resolution's `sub_namespace_match`, so that we only find a macro if it's the right type, and eliminate the special-case hack for attributes.

This allows detecting and report macro kind mismatches early, and more precisely, improving various error messages. In particular, this eliminates the case in `failed_to_match_macro` to check for a function-like invocation of a macro with no function-like rules.

Instead, macro kind mismatches now result in an unresolved macro, and we detect this case in `unresolved_macro_suggestions`, which now carefully distinguishes between a kind mismatch and other errors.

This also handles cases of forward-referenced attributes and cyclic attributes.

----

In this PR, I've minimally fixed up `rustdoc` so that it compiles and passes tests. This is just the minimal necessary fixes to handle the switch to `MacroKinds`, and it only works for macros that don't actually have multiple kinds. This will panic (with a `todo!`) if it encounters a macro with multiple kinds.

rustdoc needs further fixes to handle macros with multiple kinds, and to handle attributes and derive macros that aren't proc macros. I'd appreciate some help from a rustdoc expert on that.

----

r? ````````@petrochenkov````````
2025-08-13 18:43:01 +02:00
Josh Triplett
d7b30bef7e Expand documentation of GlobDelegation
I discovered this via research through the git log, and I want to leave
additional guidance for future macro spelunkers.
2025-08-12 09:24:45 -07:00
Josh Triplett
0b855bcdc9 Switch to a bitflags MacroKinds to support macros with more than one kind
Review everything that uses `MacroKind`, and switch anything that could
refer to more than one kind to use `MacroKinds`.

Add a new `SyntaxExtensionKind::MacroRules` for `macro_rules!` macros,
using the concrete `MacroRulesMacroExpander` type, and have it track
which kinds it can handle. Eliminate the separate optional `attr_ext`,
now that a `SyntaxExtension` can handle multiple macro kinds.

This also avoids the need to downcast when calling methods on
`MacroRulesMacroExpander`, such as `get_unused_rule`.

Integrate macro kind checking into name resolution's
`sub_namespace_match`, so that we only find a macro if it's the right
type, and eliminate the special-case hack for attributes.
2025-08-12 09:24:45 -07:00
Sasha Pourcelot
6603fe1caa Port #[allow_internal_unsafe] to the new attribute system (attempt 2) 2025-08-11 15:01:52 +02:00
Deadbeef
ad1113f87e remove P 2025-08-09 15:47:01 +08:00
Jana Dönszelmann
866bc26475
Revert "Port #[allow_internal_unsafe] to the new attribute system"
This reverts commit 4f7a6ace9e2f2192af7b5d32f4b1664189e0e143.
2025-08-08 11:54:20 +02:00
Sasha Pourcelot
4f7a6ace9e Port #[allow_internal_unsafe] to the new attribute system 2025-08-07 15:47:21 +02:00
Jana Dönszelmann
e1d3ad89c7
remove rustc_attr_data_structures 2025-07-31 14:19:27 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
6bd327374a
Rollup merge of #143607 - JonathanBrouwer:proc_macro_attrs, r=jdonszelmann,traviscross
Port the proc macro attributes to the new attribute parsing infrastructure

Ports `#[proc_macro]`, `#[proc_macro_attribute]`, `#[proc_macro_derive]` and `#[rustc_builtin_macro]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-2971351163

I've split this PR into commits for reviewability, and left some comments to clarify things
I did 4 related attributes in one PR because they share a lot of their code and logic, and doing them separately is kind of annoying as I need to leave both the old and new parsing in place then.

r? ``@oli-obk``
cc ``@jdonszelmann``
2025-07-28 01:16:38 +02:00
LorrensP-2158466
451a93e2b8 split up define into define_extern and define_local 2025-07-27 12:17:23 +02:00
Jonathan Brouwer
e64f75b3d2
Remove now un-used code
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
2025-07-26 20:26:16 +02:00
Jonathan Brouwer
ec637000c6
Use the new attributes throughout the codebase
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
2025-07-26 20:26:05 +02:00
Guillaume Gomez
96340f6714 Stop compilation if macro expansion failed 2025-07-25 23:46:28 +02:00
Josh Triplett
551cb9f1f4 mbe: Use concrete type for get_unused_rule
Rather than adding `get_unused_rule` to the `TTMacroExpander` trait, put
it on the concrete `MacroRulesMacroExpander`, and downcast to that type
via `Any` in order to call it.

Suggested-by: Vadim Petrochenkov <vadim.petrochenkov@gmail.com>
2025-07-22 00:36:10 -07:00
Vadim Petrochenkov
6849f816b1 resolve: Change &mut Resolver to &Resolver when possible 2025-07-17 02:09:01 +03:00
Jonathan Brouwer
a14baf1e56
Define datastructures for #[cfg] attribute, move StrippedCfgItem 2025-07-15 09:01:00 +02:00
Folkert de Vries
3689b80b75
make cfg_select a builtin macro 2025-07-13 14:34:40 +02:00
Josh Triplett
63cfb3af37 mbe: Defer checks for compile_error! until reporting an unused macro rule
The MBE parser checks rules at initial parse time to see if their RHS
has `compile_error!` in it, and returns a list of rule indexes and LHS
spans that don't map to `compile_error!`, for use in unused macro rule
checking.

Instead, have the unused macro rule reporting ask the macro for the rule
to report, and let the macro check at that time. That avoids checking
rules unless they're unused.

In the process, refactor the data structure used to store macro rules,
to group the LHS and RHS (and LHS span) of each rule together, and
refactor the unused rule tracking to only track rule indexes.

This ends up being a net simplification, and reduction in code size.
2025-07-05 16:23:13 -07:00
Jonathan Brouwer
3d5d72b761
Port #[target_feature] to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
2025-07-03 07:54:19 +02:00
Michael Goulet
8cd3fa04e2 Don't give APITs names with macro expansion placeholder fragments in it 2025-06-25 15:42:11 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
87456e15b2 Remove an njn: comment accidentaly left behind. 2025-06-16 15:18:48 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
376cbc3787 Introduce -Zmacro-stats.
It collects data about macro expansions and prints them in a table after
expansion finishes. It's very useful for detecting macro bloat,
especially for proc macros.

Details:
- It measures code snippets by pretty-printing them and then measuring
  lines and bytes. This required a bunch of additional pretty-printing
  plumbing, in `rustc_ast_pretty` and `rustc_expand`.
- The measurement is done in `MacroExpander::expand_invoc`.
- The measurements are stored in `ExtCtxt::macro_stats`.
2025-06-12 21:17:17 +10:00
Guillaume Gomez
93ca0af08c
Rollup merge of #141603 - nnethercote:reduce-P, r=fee1-dead
Reduce `ast::ptr::P` to a typedef of `Box`

As per the MCP at https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/878.

r? `@fee1-dead`
2025-06-06 23:53:16 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
4c4a40f6df Reorder ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union} fields.
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
       <-><----> <------------>
       /   |       \
   ident generics  variant_data
```
2025-05-28 15:48:45 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
991c91fdaa Reduce P<T> to a typedef of Box<T>.
Keep the `P` constructor function for now, to minimize immediate churn.

All the `into_inner` calls are removed, which is nice.
2025-05-27 13:29:24 +10:00
mejrs
178e09ed37 Remove rustc_attr_data_structures re-export from rustc_attr_parsing 2025-05-18 18:14:43 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
2fef0a30ae Replace infallible name_or_empty methods with fallible name methods.
I'm removing empty identifiers everywhere, because in practice they
always mean "no identifier" rather than "empty identifier". (An empty
identifier is impossible.) It's better to use `Option` to mean "no
identifier" because you then can't forget about the "no identifier"
possibility.

Some specifics:
- When testing an attribute for a single name, the commit uses the
  `has_name` method.
- When testing an attribute for multiple names, the commit uses the new
  `has_any_name` method.
- When using `match` on an attribute, the match arms now have `Some` on
  them.

In the tests, we now avoid printing empty identifiers by not printing
the identifier in the `error:` line at all, instead letting the carets
point out the problem.
2025-04-17 09:50:52 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
1b3fc585cb Rename some name variables as ident.
It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to
silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called
`ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.

This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of
`Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
2025-04-10 09:30:55 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
df247968f2 Move ast::Item::ident into ast::ItemKind.
`ast::Item` has an `ident` field.

- It's always non-empty for these item kinds: `ExternCrate`, `Static`,
  `Const`, `Fn`, `Mod`, `TyAlias`, `Enum`, `Struct`, `Union`,
  `Trait`, `TraitAlias`, `MacroDef`, `Delegation`.

- It's always empty for these item kinds: `Use`, `ForeignMod`,
  `GlobalAsm`, `Impl`, `MacCall`, `DelegationMac`.

There is a similar story for `AssocItemKind` and `ForeignItemKind`.

Some sites that handle items check for an empty ident, some don't. This
is a very C-like way of doing things, but this is Rust, we have sum
types, we can do this properly and never forget to check for the
exceptional case and never YOLO possibly empty identifiers (or possibly
dummy spans) around and hope that things will work out.

The commit is large but it's mostly obvious plumbing work. Some notable
things.

- `ast::Item` got 8 bytes bigger. This could be avoided by boxing the
  fields within some of the `ast::ItemKind` variants (specifically:
  `Struct`, `Union`, `Enum`). I might do that in a follow-up; this
  commit is big enough already.

- For the visitors: `FnKind` no longer needs an `ident` field because
  the `Fn` within how has one.

- In the parser, the `ItemInfo` typedef is no longer needed. It was used
  in various places to return an `Ident` alongside an `ItemKind`, but
  now the `Ident` (if present) is within the `ItemKind`.

- In a few places I renamed identifier variables called `name` (or
  `foo_name`) as `ident` (or `foo_ident`), to better match the type, and
  because `name` is normally used for `Symbol`s. It's confusing to see
  something like `foo_name.name`.
2025-04-01 14:08:57 +11:00
Oli Scherer
7cdc456727 Track whether an assoc item is in a trait impl or an inherent impl 2025-03-25 10:12:07 +00:00
Mara Bos
6c865c1e14 Allow builtin macros to be used more than once.
This removes E0773 "A builtin-macro was defined more than once."
2025-03-19 14:12:47 +01:00
Esteban Küber
f0b8e13b59 Do not suggest using -Zmacro-backtrace for builtin macros
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros.
2025-03-14 19:50:03 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
141719f68a Remove NtItem and NtStmt.
This involves replacing `nt_pretty_printing_compatibility_hack` with
`stream_pretty_printing_compatibility_hack`.

The handling of statements in `transcribe` is slightly different to
other nonterminal kinds, due to the lack of `from_ast` implementation
for empty statements.

Notable test changes:
- `tests/ui/proc-macro/expand-to-derive.rs`: the diff looks large but
  the only difference is the insertion of a single invisible-delimited
  group around a metavar.
2025-03-07 14:51:07 +11:00
Frank King
42f51d4fd4 Implment #[cfg] and #[cfg_attr] in where clauses 2025-03-01 22:02:46 +08:00
Jana Dönszelmann
7e0f5b5016
Introduce new-style attribute parsers for several attributes
note: compiler compiles but librustdoc and clippy don't
2025-02-24 14:31:17 +01:00
Askar Safin
0a21f1d0a2 tree-wide: parallel: Fully removed all Lrc, replaced with Arc 2025-02-03 13:25:57 +03:00
Oli Scherer
4a8773a3af Rename PatKind::Lit to Expr 2025-01-08 07:34:59 +00:00
Nicholas Nethercote
2620eb42d7 Re-export more rustc_span::symbol things from rustc_span.
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from
`rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some
closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use
rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use
rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good
reason.

This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`,
and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to
`rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly
because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to
one.
2024-12-18 13:38:53 +11:00
Jonathan Dönszelmann
efb98b6552
rename rustc_attr to rustc_attr_parsing and create rustc_attr_data_structures 2024-12-16 19:08:19 +01:00
Jonathan Dönszelmann
1341366af9
split attributes 2024-12-16 19:08:19 +01:00
Jonathan Dönszelmann
d50c0a5480
Add hir::Attribute 2024-12-15 19:18:46 +01:00
Ralf Jung
e96808162a ensure that all publicly reachable const fn have const stability info 2024-11-10 10:16:26 +01:00
Ralf Jung
a0215d8e46 Re-do recursive const stability checks
Fundamentally, we have *three* disjoint categories of functions:
1. const-stable functions
2. private/unstable functions that are meant to be callable from const-stable functions
3. functions that can make use of unstable const features

This PR implements the following system:
- `#[rustc_const_stable]` puts functions in the first category. It may only be applied to `#[stable]` functions.
- `#[rustc_const_unstable]` by default puts functions in the third category. The new attribute `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` can be added to such a function to move it into the second category.
- `const fn` without a const stability marker are in the second category if they are still unstable. They automatically inherit the feature gate for regular calls, it can now also be used for const-calls.

Also, several holes in recursive const stability checking are being closed.
There's still one potential hole that is hard to avoid, which is when MIR
building automatically inserts calls to a particular function in stable
functions -- which happens in the panic machinery. Those need to *not* be
`rustc_const_unstable` (or manually get a `rustc_const_stable_indirect`) to be
sure they follow recursive const stability. But that's a fairly rare and special
case so IMO it's fine.

The net effect of this is that a `#[unstable]` or unmarked function can be
constified simply by marking it as `const fn`, and it will then be
const-callable from stable `const fn` and subject to recursive const stability
requirements. If it is publicly reachable (which implies it cannot be unmarked),
it will be const-unstable under the same feature gate. Only if the function ever
becomes `#[stable]` does it need a `#[rustc_const_unstable]` or
`#[rustc_const_stable]` marker to decide if this should also imply
const-stability.

Adding `#[rustc_const_unstable]` is only needed for (a) functions that need to
use unstable const lang features (including intrinsics), or (b) `#[stable]`
functions that are not yet intended to be const-stable. Adding
`#[rustc_const_stable]` is only needed for functions that are actually meant to
be directly callable from stable const code. `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` is
used to mark intrinsics as const-callable and for `#[rustc_const_unstable]`
functions that are actually called from other, exposed-on-stable `const fn`. No
other attributes are required.
2024-10-25 20:31:40 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
4d378f26a9
Rollup merge of #125205 - ChrisDenton:verbatim-include, r=jieyouxu
Fixup Windows verbatim paths when used with the `include!` macro

On Windows, the following code can fail if the `OUT_DIR` environment variable is a [verbatim path](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/path/enum.Prefix.html) (i.e. begins with `\\?\`):

```rust
include!(concat!(env!("OUT_DIR"), "/src/repro.rs"));
```

This is because verbatim paths treat `/` literally, as if it were just another character in the file name.

The good news is that the standard library already has code to fix this. We can simply use `components` to normalize the path so it works as intended.
2024-10-22 15:28:35 +02:00