Do not use effective_visibilities query for Adt types of a local trait while proving a where-clause
Partially fixrust-lang/rust#145611, but we should do something make cycle in this situation ICE.
Instead of using a query, call `&tcx.resolutions(()).effective_visibilities`.
r? `````@lcnr`````
cc `````@compiler-errors`````
Unconditionally-const supertraits are considered not dyn compatible
Let's save some space in the design of const traits by making `dyn Trait` where `trait Trait: const Super` not dyn compatible.
Such a trait cannot satisfy `dyn Trait: Trait`; we could in the future make this dyn compatible but *NOT* implement `Trait`, but that's a bit weird and seems like it needs to be independently justified moving forward.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145198
r? fee1-dead
Defer tail call ret ty equality to check_tail_calls
Fixesrust-lang/rust#144892.
Currently the tail call signature check assumes that return types have been accounted for. However, this is not complete for several reasons.
Firstly, we were using subtyping instead of equality in the HIR typeck code:
e1b9081e69/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs (L1096)
We could fix this, but it doesn't really do much for us anyways since HIR typeck doesn't care about regions.
That means, secondly, we'd need to fix the terminator type check in MIR typeck to account for variances, since tail call terminators need to relate their arguments invariantly to account for the "signature must be equal" rule. This seems annoying.
All of this seems like a lot of work, and we already are *manually* checking argument equality. Let's just extend the `check_tail_calls` to account for mismatches in return types anyways.
r? ``````@WaffleLapkin``````
support non-defining uses of opaques in borrowck
Reimplements the first part of rust-lang/rust#139587, but limited to only the new solver. To do so I also entirely rewrite the way we handle opaque types in borrowck even on stable. This should not impact behavior however.
We now support revealing uses during MIR borrowck with the new solver:
```rust
fn foo<'a>(x: &'a u32) -> impl Sized + use<'a> {
let local = 1;
foo::<'_>(&local);
x
}
```
### How do opaque types work right now
Whenever we use an opaque type during type checking, we remember this use in the `opaque_type_storage` of the `InferCtxt`.
Right now, we collect all *member constraints* at the end of MIR type check by looking at all uses from the `opaque_type_storage`. We then apply these constraints while computing the region values for each SCC. This does not add actual region constraints but directly updates the final region values.
This means we need to manually handle any constraints from member constraints for diagnostics. We do this by separately tracking `applied_member_constraints` in the `RegionInferenceContext`.
After we've finished computing the region values, it is now immutable and we check whether all member constraints hold. If not, we error.
We now map the hidden types of our defining uses to the defining scope. This assumes that all member constraints apply. To handle non-member regions, we simply map any region in the hidden type we fail to map to a choice region to `'erased` b1b26b834d/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/opaque_types.rs (L126-L132)
### How do we handle opaque types with this PR
MIR type check still works the same by populating the `opaque_type_storage` whenever we use an opaque type.
We now have a new step `fn handle_opaque_type_uses` which happens between MIR type check and `compute_regions`.
This step looks at all opaque type uses in the storage and first checks whether they are defining: are the arguments of the `opaque_type_key` unique region parameters. *With the new solver we silently ignore any *non-defining* uses here. The old solver emits an errors.*
`fn compute_concrete_opaque_types`: We then collect all member constraints for the defining uses and apply them just like we did before. However, we do it on a temporary region graph which is only used while computing the concrete opaque types. We then use this region graph to compute the concrete type which we then store in the `root_cx`.
`fn apply_computed_concrete_opaque_types`: Now that we know the final concrete type of each opaque type and have mapped them to the definition of the opaque. We iterate over all opaque type uses and equate their hidden type with the instantiated final concrete type. This is the step which actually mutates the region graph.
The actual region checking can now entirely ignores opaque types (outside of the `ConstraintCategory` from checking the opaque type uses).
### Diagnostics issue (chill)
Because we now simply use type equality to "apply member constraints" we get ordinary `OutlivesConstraint`s, even if the regions were already related to another.
This is generally not an issue, expect that it can *hide* the actual region constraints which resulted in the final value of the opaque. The constraints we get from checking against the final opaque type definition relies on constraints we used to compute that definition.
I mostly handle this by updating `find_constraint_path_between_regions` to first ignore member constraints in its search and only if that does not find a path, retry while considering member constraints.
### Diagnostics issue (not chill)
A separate issue is that `find_constraint_paths_between_regions` currently looks up member constraints by their **scc**, not by region value:
2c1ac85679/compiler/rustc_borrowck/src/region_infer/mod.rs (L1768-L1775)
This means that in the `borrowck-4` test, the resulting constraint path is currently
```
('?2: '?5) due to Single(bb0[5]) (None) (Boring) (ConstraintSccIndex(1): ConstraintSccIndex(1)),
('?5: '?3) due to Single(bb0[6]) (None) (Boring) (ConstraintSccIndex(1): ConstraintSccIndex(1)),
('?3: '?0) due to All(src/main.rs:15:5: 15:6 (#0)) (None) (OpaqueType) (ConstraintSccIndex(1): ConstraintSccIndex(1))
```
Here `'?3` is equal to `'?4`, but the reason why it's in the opaque is that it's related to `'?4`. With my PR this will be correctly tracked so we end up with
```
('?2: '?5) due to Single(bb0[5]) (None) (Boring) (ConstraintSccIndex(1): ConstraintSccIndex(1)),
('?5: '?3) due to Single(bb0[6]) (None) (Boring) (ConstraintSccIndex(1): ConstraintSccIndex(1)),
('?3: '?4) due to Single(bb0[6]) (None) (Assignment) (ConstraintSccIndex(1): ConstraintSccIndex(1)),
('?4: '?0) due to All(src/main.rs:15:5: 15:6 (#0)) (None) (OpaqueType) (ConstraintSccIndex(1): ConstraintSccIndex(1)),
```
This additional `Assignment` step then worsens the error message as we stop talking about the fact that the closures is returned from the function. Fixing this is hard. I've looked into this and it's making me sad :< Properly handling this requires some deeper changes to MIR borrowck diagnostics and that seems like too much for this PR. Given that this only impacts a single test, it seems acceptable to me.
r? `@ghost`
Tell LLVM about read-only captures
`&Freeze` parameters are not only `readonly` within the function, but any captures of the pointer can also only be used for reads. This can now be encoded using the `captures(address, read_provenance)` attribute.
The capture of i in assert_ne!() is now known read-only, which
enables early SROA. Block this by passing i to println, where
we currently cannot recognize this.
`&Freeze` parameters are not only `readonly` within the function,
but any captures of the pointer can also only be used for reads.
This can now be encoded using the `captures(address, read_provenance)`
attribute.
Pretty print the name of an future from calling async closure
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145606 by introducing a way to customize the path rendering of async closures' futures in the pretty printer API.
mention lint group in default level lint note
### Summary
This PR updates lint diagnostics so that default-level notes now mention the lint group they belong to, if any.
Fixes: rust-lang/rust#65464.
### Example
```rust
fn main() {
let x = 5;
}
```
Before:
```
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` on by default
```
After:
```
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` (part of `#[warn(unused)]`) on by default
```
### Unchanged Cases
Messages remain the same when the lint level is explicitly set, e.g.:
* Attribute on the lint `#[warn(unused_variables)]`:
```
note: the lint level is defined here
LL | #[warn(unused_variables)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
* Attribute on the group `#[warn(unused)]:`:
```
= note: `#[warn(unused_variables)]` implied by `#[warn(unused)]`
```
* CLI option `-W unused`:
```
= note: `-W unused-variables` implied by `-W unused`
= help: to override `-W unused` add `#[allow(unused_variables)]`
```
* CLI option `-W unused-variables`:
```
= note: requested on the command line with `-W unused-variables`
```
ignore frontmatters in `TokenStream::new`
Fixesrust-lang/rust#145520 for now, we'd likely want to figure the stripping part later, so I noted it down on the list on the tracking issue.
cc `@fmease`
Do not consider a `T: !Sized` candidate to satisfy a `T: !MetaSized` obligation.
This example should fail to compile (and does under this PR, with the old and new solvers), but currently compiles successfully ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2024&gist=6e0e5d0ae0cdf0571dea97938fb4a86d)), because (IIUC) the old solver's `lazily_elaborate_sizedness_candidate`/callers and the new solver's `TraitPredicate::fast_reject_assumption`/`match_assumption` consider a `T: _ Sized` candidate to satisfy a `T: _ MetaSized` obligation, for either polarity `_`, when that should only hold for positive polarity.
```rs
#![feature(negative_bounds)]
#![feature(sized_hierarchy)]
use std::marker::MetaSized;
fn foo<T: !MetaSized>() {}
fn bar<T: !Sized + MetaSized>() {
foo::<T>();
//~^ ERROR the trait bound `T: !MetaSized` is not satisfied // error under this PR
}
```
Only observable with the internal-only `feature(negative_bounds)`, so might just be "wontfix".
This example is added as a test in this PR (as well as testing that `foo<()>` and `foo<str>` are disallowed for `fn foo<T: !MetaSized`).
cc `@davidtwco` for `feature(sized_hierarchy)`
Maybe similar to 91c53c9 from <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143307>
Port must_use to the new target checking
This PR ports `must_use` to the new target checking logic
This also adds a tool-only suggestion to remove attributes on invalid targets, as to not immediately undo the work of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145274
r? `@jdonszelmann`
Properly recover from parenthesized use-bounds (precise capturing lists) plus small cleanups
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145470.
First commit fixes the issue, second one performs some desperately needed cleanups.
The fix shouldn't be a breaking change because IINM the parser always ensures that all brackets are balanced (via a buffer of brackets). Meaning even though we used to accept `(use<>` as a valid precise capturing list, it was guaranteed that we would fail in the end.
Rehome 37 `tests/ui/issues/` tests to other subdirectories under `tests/ui/`
Part of rust-lang/rust#133895
Methodology:
1. Refer to the previously written `tests/ui/SUMMARY.md`
2. Find an appropriate category for the test, using the original issue thread and the test contents.
3. Add the issue URL at the bottom (not at the top, as that would mess up stderr line numbers)
4. Rename the tests to make their purpose clearer
Inspired by the methodology that ``@Kivooeo`` was using.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
nll-relate: improve hr opaque types support
This should currently not be user-facing outside of diagnostics as even if we successfully relate the opaque types, we don't support opaque types with non-param arguments and also require all member regions to be equal to the arguments or `'static`. This means there's no way to end up with a placeholder in the hidden type.
r? types
Add `-Zindirect-branch-cs-prefix`
Cc: ``@azhogin`` ``@Darksonn``
This goes on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135927, i.e. please skip the first commit here. Please feel free to inherit it there.
In fact, I am not sure if there is any use case for the flag without `-Zretpoline*`. GCC and Clang allow it, though.
There is a `FIXME` for two `ignore`s in the test that I took from another test I did in the past -- they may be needed or not here since I didn't run the full CI. Either way, it is not critical.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116852.
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/868.
Detect missing `derive` on unresolved attribute even when not imported
When encountering unresolved attributes, ensure the proc-macros for every crate in scope are added to the `macro_map` so that typos and missing `derive`s are properly detected.
```
error: cannot find attribute `sede` in this scope
--> $DIR/missing-derive-3.rs:20:7
|
LL | #[sede(untagged)]
| ^^^^
|
help: the derive macros `Deserialize` and `Serialize` accept the similarly named `serde` attribute
|
LL | #[serde(untagged)]
| +
error: cannot find attribute `serde` in this scope
--> $DIR/missing-derive-3.rs:14:7
|
LL | #[serde(untagged)]
| ^^^^^
|
note: `serde` is imported here, but it is a crate, not an attribute
--> $DIR/missing-derive-3.rs:4:1
|
LL | extern crate serde;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: `serde` is an attribute that can be used by the derive macros `Deserialize` and `Serialize`, you might be missing a `derive` attribute
|
LL + #[derive(Deserialize, Serialize)]
LL | enum B {
|
```
Follow up to rust-lang/rust#134841. Fixrust-lang/rust#47608.
Using an error type instead of `()` avoids the duplicated errors
on `struct SUnsizedField` in `deriving-from-wrong-target.rs`. It also
improves the expanded output from this:
```
struct S2(u32, u32);
impl ::core::convert::From<()> for S2 {
#[inline]
fn from(value: ()) -> S2 { (/*ERROR*/) }
}
```
to this:
```
struct S2(u32, u32);
impl ::core::convert::From<(/*ERROR*/)> for S2 {
#[inline]
fn from(value: (/*ERROR*/)) -> S2 { (/*ERROR*/) }
}
```
The new code also only matchs on `item.kind` once.
Remove the `From` derive macro from prelude
The new `#[derive(From)]` functionality (implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144922) caused name resolution ambiguity issues (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145524). The reproducer looks e.g. like this:
```rust
mod foo {
pub use derive_more::From;
}
use foo::*;
#[derive(From)] // ERROR: `From` is ambiguous
struct S(u32);
```
It's pretty unfortunate that it works like this, but I guess that there's not much to be done here, and we'll have to wait for the next edition to put the `From` macro into the prelude. That will probably require https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139493 to land.
I created a new module in core (and re-exported it in std) called `from`, where I re-exported the `From` macro. I *think* that since this is a new module, it should not have the same backwards incompatibility issue.
Happy to hear suggestions about the naming - maybe it would make sense as `core::macros::from::From`? But we already had a precedent in the `core::assert_matches` module, so I just followed suit.
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145524
r? ``@petrochenkov``
take attr style into account in diagnostics
when the original attribute was specified as an inner attribute, the suggestion will now match that attribute style
rework GAT borrowck limitation error
The old one depends on the `ConstraintCategory` of the constraint which meant we did not emit this note if we had to prove the higher ranked trait bound due to e.g. normalization.
This made it annoying brittle and caused MIR borrowck errors to be order dependent, fixes the issue in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140737#discussion_r2259592651.
r? types cc ```@amandasystems```
overhaul `&mut` suggestions in borrowck errors
* This refactors the logic so that it does not use fuzzy string matching for suggestions; it instead uses information directly from MIR.
* If something comes from a custom `Index` impl for which the `IndexMut` trait does not apply, do not suggest adding `mut` after `&`.
* Suggest `get_mut` with `unwrap` if error is fired on `BTreeMap` or `HashMap`.
Supersedes rust-lang/rust#144018 cc ```@xizheyin```
Closesrust-lang/rust#143732
Don't warn on never to any `as` casts as unreachable
I'm doing this while being sleep deprived on a night train, let's hope this is coherent.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#67227
Remove the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute in favor of `#[sanitize(xyz = "on|off")]`
This came up during the sanitizer stabilization (rust-lang/rust#123617). Instead of a `#[no_sanitize(xyz)]` attribute, we would like to have a `#[sanitize(xyz = "on|off")]` attribute, which is more powerful and allows to be extended in the future (instead
of just focusing on turning sanitizers off). The implementation is done according to what was [discussed on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/343119-project-exploit-mitigations/topic/Stabilize.20the.20.60no_sanitize.60.20attribute/with/495377292)).
The new attribute also works on modules, traits and impl items and thus enables usage as the following:
```rust
#[sanitize(address = "off")]
mod foo {
fn unsanitized(..) {}
#[sanitize(address = "on")]
fn sanitized(..) {}
}
trait MyTrait {
#[sanitize(address = "off")]
fn unsanitized_default(..) {}
}
#[sanitize(thread = "off")]
impl MyTrait for () {
...
}
```
r? ```@rcvalle```
`impl PartialEq<{str,String}> for {Path,PathBuf}`
This is a revival of #105877
Comparison of paths and strings is expected to be possible and needed e.g. in tests. This change adds the impls os `PartialEq` between strings and paths, both owned and unsized, in both directions.
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/151
This removes the #[no_sanitize] attribute, which was behind an unstable
feature named no_sanitize. Instead, we introduce the sanitize attribute
which is more powerful and allows to be extended in the future (instead
of just focusing on turning sanitizers off).
This also makes sanitize(kernel_address = ..) attribute work with
-Zsanitize=address
To do it the same as how clang disables address sanitizer, we now
disable ASAN on sanitize(kernel_address = "off") and KASAN on
sanitize(address = "off").
The same was added to clang in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44981.
This change implements the #[sanitize(..)] attribute, which opts to
replace the currently unstable #[no_sanitize]. Essentially the new
attribute works similar as #[no_sanitize], just with more flexible
options regarding where it is applied. E.g. it is possible to turn
a certain sanitizer either on or off:
`#[sanitize(address = "on|off")]`
This attribute now also applies to more places, e.g. it is possible
to turn off a sanitizer for an entire module or impl block:
```rust
\#[sanitize(address = "off")]
mod foo {
fn unsanitized(..) {}
#[sanitize(address = "on")]
fn sanitized(..) {}
}
\#[sanitize(thread = "off")]
impl MyTrait for () {
...
}
```
This attribute is enabled behind the unstable `sanitize` feature.
Implement declarative (`macro_rules!`) derive macros (RFC 3698)
This is a draft for review, and should not be merged yet.
This is layered atop https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145153 , and has
only two additional commits atop that. The first handles parsing and provides a
test for various parse errors. The second implements expansion and handles
application.
This implements RFC 3698, "Declarative (`macro_rules!`) derive macros".
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143549
This has one remaining issue, which I could use some help debugging: in
`tests/ui/macros/macro-rules-derive-error.rs`, the diagnostics for
`derive(fn_only)` (for a `fn_only` with no `derive` rules) and
`derive(ForwardReferencedDerive)` both get emitted twice, as a duplicate
diagnostic.
From what I can tell via adding some debugging code,
`unresolved_macro_suggestions` is getting called twice from
`finalize_macro_resolutions` for each of them, because
`self.single_segment_macro_resolutions` has two entries for the macro, with two
different `parent_scope` values. I'm not clear on why that happened; it doesn't
happen with the equivalent code using attrs.
I'd welcome any suggestions for fixing this.
