Note that the code in `LLVMRustDIBuilderCreateStaticVariable` that tried to
downcast `InitVal` appears to have been dead, because `llvm::ConstantInt` and
`llvm::ConstantFP` are not subclasses of `llvm::GlobalVariable`.
Introduce debuginfo to statements in MIR
The PR introduces support for debug information within dead statements. Currently, only the reference statement is supported, which is sufficient to fix rust-lang/rust#128081.
I don't modify Stable MIR, as I don't think we need debug information when using it.
This PR represents the debug information for the dead reference statement via `#dbg_value`. For example, `let _foo_b = &foo.b` becomes `#dbg_value(ptr %foo, !22, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), !26)`. You can see this here: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/d43js6adv.
The general principle for handling debug information is to never provide less debug information than the optimized LLVM IR.
The current rules for dropping debug information in this PR are:
- If the LLVM IR cannot represent a reference address, it's replaced with poison or simply dropped. For example, see: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/shGqPec8W. I'm using poison in all such cases now.
- All debuginfos is dropped when merging multiple successor BBs. An example is available here: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/TE1q3Wq6M.
I doesn't drop debuginfos in `MatchBranchSimplification`, because LLVM also pick one branch for it.
Much of the compiler calls functions on Align projected from AbiAlign.
AbiAlign impls Deref to its inner Align, so we can simplify these away.
Also, it will minimize disruption when AbiAlign is removed.
For now, preserve usages that might resolve to PartialOrd or PartialEq,
as those have odd inference.
cg_llvm: Replace some DIBuilder wrappers with LLVM-C API bindings (part 5)
- Part of rust-lang/rust#134001
- Follow-up to rust-lang/rust#146673
---
This is another batch of LLVMDIBuilder binding migrations, replacing some our own LLVMRust bindings with bindings to upstream LLVM-C APIs.
Some of these are a little more complex than most of the previous migrations, because they split one LLVMRust binding into multiple LLVM bindings, but nothing too fancy.
This appears to be the last of the low-hanging fruit. As noted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134001#issuecomment-2524979268, the remaining bindings are difficult or impossible to migrate at present.
Add an attribute to check the number of lanes in a SIMD vector after monomorphization
Allows std::simd to drop the `LaneCount<N>: SupportedLaneCount` trait and maintain good error messages.
Also, extends rust-lang/rust#145967 by including spans in layout errors for all ADTs.
r? ``@RalfJung``
cc ``@workingjubilee`` ``@programmerjake``
rename erase_regions to erase_and_anonymize_regions
I find it consistently confusing that `erase_regions` does more than replacing regions with `'erased`. it also makes some code look real goofy to be writing manual folders to erase regions with a comment saying "we cant use erase regions" :> or code that re-calls erase_regions on types with regions already erased just to anonymize all the bound regions.
r? lcnr
idk how i feel about the name being almost twice as long now
We have a few ui tests to ensure we emit an error if we encounter too
big arrays. Before this fix, compiling the tests with `-Cdebuginfo=2`
would not include the spans of the instantiation sites, because the
error is then emitted from a different code path that does not include
the span.
Propagate the span to the error also in the debuginfo case, so the tests
passes regardless of debuginfo level.
We have a ui test to ensure we emit an error if we encounter too big
enums. Before this fix, compiling the test with `-Cdebuginfo=2` would
not include the span of the instantiation site, because the error is
then emitted from a different code path that does not include the span.
Propagate the span to the error also in the debuginfo case, so the test
passes regardless of debuginfo level.
fix(debuginfo): handle false positives in overflow check
Fixesrust-lang/rust#144636.
Duplicate wrappers and normal recursive types can lead to false positives.
```rust
struct Recursive {
a: Box<Box<Recursive>>,
}
```
The ADT stack can be:
- `Box<Recursive>`
- `Recursive`
- `Box<Box<Recursive>>` (`Box` now detected as expanding)
We can filter them out by tracing the generic arg back through the stack, as true expanding recursive types must have their expanding arg used as generic arg throughout.
r? ````@wesleywiser````
Instead of collecting pretty printers transitively when building
executables/staticlibs/cdylibs, let the debugger find each crate's
pretty printers via its .debug_gdb_scripts section. This covers the case
where libraries defining custom pretty printers are loaded dynamically.
Make sure that compiler and linker don't optimize the section's contents
away by adding the global holding the data to "llvm.used". The volatile
load in the main shim is retained because "llvm.used", which translates
to SHF_GNU_RETAIN on ELF targets, requires a reasonably recent linker;
emitting the volatile load ensures compatibility with older linkers, at
least when libstd is used.
Pretty printers in dylib dependencies are now emitted by the main crate
instead of the dylib; apart from matching how rlibs are handled, this
approach has the advantage that `omit_gdb_pretty_printer_section` keeps
working with dylib dependencies.
Disabling loading of pretty printers in the debugger itself is more
reliable. Before this commit the .gdb_debug_scripts section couldn't be
included in dylibs or rlibs as otherwise there is no way to disable the
section anymore without recompiling the entire standard library.
fix(debuginfo): disable overflow check for recursive non-enum types
Commit b10edb4 introduce an overflow check when generating debuginfo for expanding recursive types. While this check works correctly for enums, it can incorrectly prune valid debug information for structures.
For example see rust-lang/rust#143241 (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143241#issuecomment-3073721477). Furthermore, for structures such check does not make sense, since structures with recursively expanding types simply will not compile (there is a `hir_analysis_recursive_generic_parameter` for that).
closesrust-lang/rust#143241
