Add tests (and a bit of cleanup) for interior mut handling in promotion and const-checking
Basically these are the parts of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121786 that can be salvaged.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Fix type resolution of associated const equality bounds (take 2)
Instead of trying to re-resolve the type of assoc const bindings inside the `type_of` query impl in an incomplete manner, transfer the already (correctly) resolved type from `add_predicates_for_ast_type_binding` to `type_of`/`anon_type_of` through query feeding.
---
Together with #118668 (merged) and #121258, this supersedes #118360.
Fixes#118040.
r? ``@ghost``
Allow multiple `impl Into<{D,Subd}iagMessage>` parameters in a function.
The internal diagnostic lint currently only allows one, because that was all that occurred in practice. But rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/12453 wants to introduce functions with more than one, and this limitation is getting in the way.
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Expose the Freeze trait again (unstably) and forbid implementing it manually
non-emoji version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121501
cc #60715
This trait is useful for generic constants (associated consts of generic traits). See the test (`tests/ui/associated-consts/freeze.rs`) added in this PR for a usage example. The builtin `Freeze` trait is the only way to do it, users cannot work around this issue.
It's also a useful trait for building some very specific abstrations, as shown by the usage by the `zerocopy` crate: https://github.com/google/zerocopy/issues/941
cc ```@RalfJung```
T-lang signed off on reexposing this unstably: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121501#issuecomment-1969827742
The internal diagnostic lint currently only allows one, because that was
all that occurred in practice. But rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/12453
wants to introduce functions with more than one, and this limitation is
getting in the way.
Stop using LLVM struct types for byval/sret
For `byval` and `sret`, the type has no semantic meaning, only the size matters\*†. Using `[N x i8]` is a more direct way to specify that we want `N` bytes, and avoids relying on LLVM's struct layout.
\*: The alignment would matter, if we didn't explicitly specify it. From what I can tell, we always specified the alignment for `sret`; for `byval`, we didn't until #112157.
†: For `byval`, the hidden copy may be impacted by padding in the LLVM struct type, i.e. padding bytes may not be copied. (I'm not sure if this is done today, but I think it would be legal.) But we manually pad our LLVM struct types specifically to avoid there ever being LLVM-visible padding, so that shouldn't be an issue.
Split out from #121577.
r? `@nikic`
diagnostics: Do not suggest using `#[unix_sigpipe]` without a value
Remove `Word` from the `unix_sigpipe` attribute template so that plain `#[unix_sigpipe]` is not included in suggestions of valid forms of the attribute. Also re-arrange diagnostics code slightly to avoid duplicate diagnostics.
Tracking issue is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889.
MIR printing: print the path of uneval'd const
Currently it just prints `const _` which makes it impossible to say which constant is being referred to.
Also refer to promoteds in a consistent way; previously MIR printing would do
```
promoted[0] in C1: &Option<Cell<i32>> = {
// ...
}
```
Now that should be
```
const C1::promoted[0]: &Option<Cell<i32>> = {
// ...
}
```
We don't seem to have a test for that so I tried it by hand, it seems to work:
```
const main::promoted[12]: &[&str; 3] = {
let mut _0: &[&str; 3];
let mut _1: [&str; 3];
let mut _2: &str;
let mut _3: &str;
let mut _4: &str;
let mut _5: &str;
bb0: {
_3 = const "b";
_2 = &(*_3);
_5 = const "c";
_4 = &(*_5);
_1 = [const "a", move _2, move _4];
_0 = &_1;
return;
}
}
```
Detect typos for compiletest test directives
Checks directives against a known list of compiletest directives collected during migration from legacy-style compiletest directives. A suggestion for the best matching known directive will be made if an invalid directive is found.
This PR does not attempt to implement checks for Makefile directives because they still have the problem of regular comments and directives sharing the same comment prefix `#`.
Closes#83551.
Remove `Word` from the `unix_sigpipe` attribute template so that plain
`#[unix_sigpipe]` is not included in suggestions of valid forms of the
attribute. Also re-arrange diagnostics code slightly to avoid duplicate
diagnostics.
Fixing shellcheck comments on lvi test script
Running `shellcheck` on `tests/run-make/x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx-lvi/script.sh` gives plenty of warnings. This PR fixes those issues. For completeness: #121683 fixes another warning as well
Update a test to support Symbol Mangling V0
Note that since this is a symbol from `std`, overriding the symbol mangling version via the `compile-flags` directive does not work.
Distinguish between library and lang UB in assert_unsafe_precondition
As described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121583#issuecomment-1963168186, `assert_unsafe_precondition` now explicitly distinguishes between language UB (conditions we explicitly optimize on) and library UB (things we document you shouldn't do, and maybe some library internals assume you don't do).
`debug_assert_nounwind` was originally added to avoid the "only at runtime" aspect of `assert_unsafe_precondition`. Since then the difference between the macros has gotten muddied. This totally revamps the situation.
Now _all_ preconditions shall be checked with `assert_unsafe_precondition`. If you have a precondition that's only checkable at runtime, do a `const_eval_select` hack, as done in this PR.
r? RalfJung
Vec::try_with_capacity
Related to #91913
Implements try_with_capacity for `Vec`, `VecDeque`, and `String`. I can follow it up with more collections if desired.
`Vec::try_with_capacity()` is functionally equivalent to the current stable:
```rust
let mut v = Vec::new();
v.try_reserve_exact(n)?
```
However, `try_reserve` calls non-inlined `finish_grow`, which requires old and new `Layout`, and is designed to reallocate memory. There is benefit to using `try_with_capacity`, besides syntax convenience, because it generates much smaller code at the call site with a direct call to the allocator. There's codegen test included.
It's also a very desirable functionality for users of `no_global_oom_handling` (Rust-for-Linux), since it makes a very commonly used function available in that environment (`with_capacity` is used much more frequently than all `(try_)reserve(_exact)`).
Eagerly translate `HelpUseLatestEdition` in parser diagnostics
Fixes#122130.
This makes me suspicious of these other two usage of `add_to_diagnostic()`. Would they *also* crash? I haven't attempted to construct test cases for them.
```
compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs
3453: errors::HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(e);
compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/expr.rs
2603: HelpUseLatestEdition::new().add_to_diagnostic(&mut err);
```
This also seems like a footgun?
Misc improvements to non local defs lint implementation
This PR is a collection of small improvements I found when I [needlessly tried](https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120393#issuecomment-1971787475) to fix a "perf-regression" in the lint implementation.
I recommend looking at each commit individually.
Lint singleton gaps after exclusive ranges
In the discussion to stabilize exclusive range patterns (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854), it has often come up that they're likely to cause off-by-one mistakes. We already have the `overlapping_range_endpoints` lint, so I [proposed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/37854#issuecomment-1845580712) a lint to catch the complementary mistake.
This PR adds a new `non_contiguous_range_endpoints` lint that catches likely off-by-one errors with exclusive range patterns. Here's the idea (see the test file for more examples):
```rust
match x {
0..10 => ..., // WARN: this range doesn't match `10_u8` because `..` is an exclusive range
11..20 => ..., // this could appear to continue range `0_u8..10_u8`, but `10_u8` isn't matched by either of them
_ => ...,
}
// help: use an inclusive range instead: `0_u8..=10_u8`
```
More precisely: for any exclusive range `lo..hi`, if `hi+1` is matched by another range but `hi` isn't, we suggest writing an inclusive range `lo..=hi` instead. We also catch `lo..T::MAX`.
Don't ICE if we collect no RPITITs unless there are no unification errors
Move an assertion in `collect_return_position_impl_trait_in_trait_tys` to after the `ObligationCtxt::eq` calls, so that we only assert and ICE if we have unification errors.
Fixes#121468
