4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Esteban Küber
ac980cace8 Make obligation cause code suggestions verbose
```
error[E0277]: `()` is not a future
  --> $DIR/unnecessary-await.rs:28:10
   |
LL |     e!().await;
   |          ^^^^^ `()` is not a future
   |
   = help: the trait `Future` is not implemented for `()`
   = note: () must be a future or must implement `IntoFuture` to be awaited
   = note: required for `()` to implement `IntoFuture`
help: remove the `.await`
   |
LL -     e!().await;
LL +     e!();
   |
```
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:1:47
   |
LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [None; 5];
   |                                               ^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String`
   |
   = note: required for `Option<String>` to implement `Copy`
   = note: the `Copy` trait is required because this value will be copied for each element of the array
help: create an inline `const` block
   |
LL | static _MAYBE_STRINGS: [Option<String>; 5] = [const { None }; 5];
   |                                               +++++++      +
```
2025-06-06 20:12:11 +00:00
Esteban Küber
5b54286640 Remove detail from label/note that is already available in other note
Remove the "which is required by `{root_obligation}`" post-script in
"the trait `X` is not implemented for `Y`" explanation in E0277. This
information is already conveyed in the notes explaining requirements,
making it redundant while making the text (particularly in labels)
harder to read.

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
   |
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`
   |
   = note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
   |
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
   |                 ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
vs the prior

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `NotCopy: Copy` is not satisfied
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:10:13
   |
LL | static FOO: IsCopy<Option<NotCopy>> = IsCopy { t: None };
   |             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `NotCopy`, which is required by `Option<NotCopy>: Copy`
   |
   = note: required for `Option<NotCopy>` to implement `Copy`
note: required by a bound in `IsCopy`
  --> $DIR/wf-static-type.rs:7:17
   |
LL | struct IsCopy<T:Copy> { t: T }
   |                 ^^^^ required by this bound in `IsCopy`
```
2024-10-29 16:26:57 +00:00
Esteban Küber
6efddac288 Provide more context on derived obligation error primary label
Expand the primary span of E0277 when the immediate unmet bound is not what the user wrote:

```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `i32: Bar` is not satisfied
 --> f100.rs:6:6
  |
6 |     <i32 as Foo>::foo();
  |      ^^^ the trait `Bar` is not implemented for `i32`, which is required by `i32: Foo`
  |
help: this trait has no implementations, consider adding one
 --> f100.rs:2:1
  |
2 | trait Bar {}
  | ^^^^^^^^^
note: required for `i32` to implement `Foo`
 --> f100.rs:3:14
  |
3 | impl<T: Bar> Foo for T {}
  |         ---  ^^^     ^
  |         |
  |         unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```

Fix #40120.
2024-01-30 21:28:18 +00:00
apekros
e71ee500d1 Add test for rust-lang#114912 2023-09-29 22:39:02 +10:00