remove incorrect fast path
Using `tcx.is_copy_modulo_regions` drops information from the current `typing_env`. Writing a regression test for this is really hard. We need to prove `Copy` of something that doesn't directly reference a coroutine or an opaque, but does so indirectly.
cc rust-lang/rust#146813.
c-variadic: allow c-variadic inherent and trait methods
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44930
Continuing the work of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/146342, allow inherent and trait methods to be c-variadic. However, a trait that contains a c-variadic method is no longer dyn-compatible.
There is, presumably, some way to make c-variadic methods dyn-compatible. However currently, we don't have confidence that it'll work reliably: when methods from a `dyn` object are cast to a function pointer, a `ReifyShim` is created. If that shim is c-variadic, it would need to forward the C variable argument list.
That does appear to work, because the `va_list` is not represented in MIR at all in this case, so the registers from the call site are untouched by the shim and can be read by the actual implementation. That just does not seem like a solid implementation.
Also, intuitively, why would c-variadic function, primarily needed for FFI, need to be used with `dyn` objects at all? We can revisit this limitation if a need arises.
r? `@workingjubilee`
Clean up `ty::Dynamic`
1. As a follow-up to PR rust-lang/rust#143036, remove `DynKind` entirely.
2. Inside HIR ty lowering, consolidate modules `dyn_compatibility` and `lint` into `dyn_trait`
* `dyn_compatibility` wasn't about dyn compatibility itself, it's about lowering trait object types
* `lint` contained dyn-Trait-specific diagnostics+lints only
Detect attempt to use var-args in closure
```
error: unexpected `...`
--> $DIR/no-closure.rs:11:14
|
LL | let f = |...| {};
| ^^^ not a valid pattern
|
= note: only `extern "C"` and `extern "C-unwind"` functions may have a C variable argument list
error: unexpected `...`
--> $DIR/no-closure.rs:16:17
|
LL | let f = |_: ...| {};
| ^^^
|
= note: only `extern "C"` and `extern "C-unwind"` functions may have a C variable argument list
```
Fixrust-lang/rust#146489, when trying to use c-style var-args in a closure. We emit a more targeted message. We also silence inference errors when the pattern is `PatKind::Err`.
Migrate `UnsizedConstParamTy` to unstable impl of `ConstParamTy_`
Now that we have ``#[unstable_feature_bound]``, we can remove ``UnsizedConstParamTy`` that was meant to be an unstable impl of stable type and ``ConstParamTy_`` trait.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Make `AssocItem` aware of its impl kind
The general goal is to have fewer query dependencies by making `AssocItem` aware of its parent impl kind (inherent vs. trait) without having to query the parent def_kind.
See individual commits.
but a C-variadic method makes a trait dyn-incompatible. That is because
methods from dyn traits, when cast to a function pointer, create a shim.
That shim can't really forward the c-variadic arguments.
This reverts commit 1eeb8e8b151d1da7daa73837a25dc5f7a1a7fa28, reversing
changes made to 324bf2b9fd8bf9661e7045c8a93f5ff0ec1a8ca5.
Unfortunately the assert desugaring change is not backwards compatible,
see RUST-145770.
Code such as
```rust
#[derive(Debug)]
struct F {
data: bool
}
impl std::ops::Not for F {
type Output = bool;
fn not(self) -> Self::Output { !self.data }
}
fn main() {
let f = F { data: true };
assert!(f);
}
```
would be broken by the assert desugaring change. We may need to land
the change over an edition boundary, or limit the editions that the
desugaring change impacts.
rename erase_regions to erase_and_anonymize_regions
I find it consistently confusing that `erase_regions` does more than replacing regions with `'erased`. it also makes some code look real goofy to be writing manual folders to erase regions with a comment saying "we cant use erase regions" :> or code that re-calls erase_regions on types with regions already erased just to anonymize all the bound regions.
r? lcnr
idk how i feel about the name being almost twice as long now
Port limit attributes to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Doesn't pass tests, to be rebased on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145792 which will solve that
r? `@fmease`
Suggest bounds in more cases, accounting for type parameters referenced in predicate
Use a `ty::Visitor` to see if the failed predicate references a type parameter. If it does, then we only suggest adding a bound to an (associated) item only if the referenced parameter is present in its generics.
Provide adding bound suggestion in trait and impl associated functions in cases we previously weren't:
```
error[E0277]: `?` couldn't convert the error to `ApplicationError`
--> $DIR/suggest-complex-bound-on-method.rs:18:16
|
LL | t.run()?;
| -----^ the trait `From<<T as Trait>::Error>` is not implemented for `ApplicationError`
| |
| this can't be annotated with `?` because it has type `Result<_, <T as Trait>::Error>`
|
note: `ApplicationError` needs to implement `From<<T as Trait>::Error>`
--> $DIR/suggest-complex-bound-on-method.rs:12:1
|
LL | enum ApplicationError {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
= note: the question mark operation (`?`) implicitly performs a conversion on the error value using the `From` trait
help: consider introducing a `where` clause, but there might be an alternative better way to express this requirement
|
LL | fn thing<T: Trait>(&self, t: T) -> Result<(), ApplicationError> where ApplicationError: From<<T as Trait>::Error> {
| +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
```
Fixrust-lang/rust#144734.
cleanup and cache proof tree building
There's some cruft left over from when we had deep proof trees. We never encounter overflow when evaluating proof trees. Even if the recursion limit is `0`, we still only hit the overflow limit when evaluating nested goals of the root. The root goal simply inherits the `root_depth` of the `SearchGraph`.
Split `evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree` from the rest of the trait solver. This enables us to simplify the implementation of `evaluate_goal_raw` and the `ProofTreeBuilder` as we no longer need to manually track the state of the builder and can instead use separate types for that. It does require making a few internal methods into associated functions taking a `delegate` and a `span` instead of the `EvalCtxt` itself.
I've also split `SearchGraph::evaluate_goal` and `SearchGraph::evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree` for the same reason. Both functions don't actually share too much code, so by splitting them each version gets significantly easier to read.
Add a `query evaluate_root_goal_for_proof_tree_raw` to cache proof tree building. This requires arena allocating `inspect::Probe`. I've added a new type alias `I::ProbeRef` for this. We may need to adapt this for rust-analyzer? It would definitely be easy to remove the `Copy` bound here 🤔
This was done in #145740 and #145947. It is causing problems for people
using r-a on anything that uses the rustc-dev rustup package, e.g. Miri,
clippy.
This repository has lots of submodules and subtrees and various
different projects are carved out of pieces of it. It seems like
`[workspace.dependencies]` will just be more trouble than it's worth.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `usize: Neg` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/negative-literal-infered-to-unsigned.rs:2:14
|
LL | for x in -5..5 {
| ^^ the trait `Neg` is not implemented for `usize`
|
help: consider specifying an integer type that can be negative
|
LL | for x in -5isize..5 {
| +++++
```
When determining if a trait has no entries for the purposes of omitting vptrs from subtrait vtables, consider its transitive supertraits' entries, instead of just its own entries.
When determining if a non-first supertrait vptr can be omitted from a subtrait vtable, check if the supertrait or any of its (transitive) supertraits have methods, instead of only checking if the supertrait itself has methods.
This fixes the soundness issue where a vptr would be omitted for a supertrait with no methods but that itself had a supertrait with methods, while still optimizing the case where the supertrait is "truly" empty (it has no own vtable entries, and none of its (transitive) supertraits have any own vtable entries).
Fixes <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145752>
-----
Old description:
~~Treat all non-auto traits as non-empty (possibly having methods) for purposes of determining if we need to emit a vptr for a non-direct supertrait (and for new "sibling" entries after a direct or non-direct supertrait).~~
This fixes (I believe) the soundness issue, ~~but regresses vtable sizes and possibly upcasting perf in some cases when using trait hierarchies with empty non-auto traits (see `tests/ui/traits/vtable/multiple-markers.stderr`) since we use vptrs in some cases where we could re-use the vtable.~~
Fixes <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145752>
Re-opens (not anymore) <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114942>
Should not affect <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131813> (i.e. the soundness issue is still fixed, ~~though the relevant vtables in the `trait Evil` example will be larger now~~)
cc implementation history <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131864> <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113856>
-----
~~It should be possible to check if a trait has any methods from itself *or* supertraits (instead of just from itself), but to fix the immediate soundness issue, just assume any non-auto trait could have methods. A more optimistic check can be implemented later (or if someone does it soon it could just supercede this PR 😄).~~ Done in latest push
`@rustbot` label A-dyn-trait F-trait_upcasting
