In writing up the reference for frontmatter, I realized that we probably
shouldn't be accepting Unicode Line Ending characters between the code
fence and infostring or trailing after the infostring or a code fence.
In digging into the unicode specification we use for Whitespace, it
divides it up into categories, so I'm deferring to what it says for
horizontal whitespace for what should be used within a line.
Note, I am leaving out support for Unicde Default Ignorable characters.
I figure that can be discussed outside of this change within the
reference and tracking issue.
The RFC only limits hyphens at the beginning of lines and not if they
are indented or embedded in other content.
Sticking to that approach was confirmed by the T-lang liason at
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141367#issuecomment-3202217544
There is a regression in error message quality which I'm leaving for
someone if they feel this needs improving.
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to
consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on
distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due
to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's
`workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust
workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts).
This breakage was reported in
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>.
This reverts commit 48caf81484b50dca5a5cebb614899a3df81ca898, reversing
changes made to c6662879b27f5161e95f39395e3c9513a7b97028.
It was added in #123752 to handle some cases involving emoji, but it
isn't necessary because it's always treated the same as
`TokenKind::InvalidIdent`. This commit removes it, which makes things a
little simpler.
- Rename it as `invalid_ident_or_prefix`, which matches the possible
outputs (`InvalidIdent` or `InvalidPrefix`).
- Use the local wrapper for `is_xid_continue`, for consistency.
- Make it clear what `\u{200d}` means.
We already do this for a number of crates, e.g. `rustc_middle`,
`rustc_span`, `rustc_metadata`, `rustc_span`, `rustc_errors`.
For the ones we don't, in many cases the attributes are a mess.
- There is no consistency about order of attribute kinds (e.g.
`allow`/`deny`/`feature`).
- Within attribute kind groups (e.g. the `feature` attributes),
sometimes the order is alphabetical, and sometimes there is no
particular order.
- Sometimes the attributes of a particular kind aren't even grouped
all together, e.g. there might be a `feature`, then an `allow`, then
another `feature`.
This commit extends the existing sorting to all compiler crates,
increasing consistency. If any new attribute line is added there is now
only one place it can go -- no need for arbitrary decisions.
Exceptions:
- `rustc_log`, `rustc_next_trait_solver` and `rustc_type_ir_macros`,
because they have no crate attributes.
- `rustc_codegen_gcc`, because it's quasi-external to rustc (e.g. it's
ignored in `rustfmt.toml`).
Do not accept the following
```rust
macro_rules! lexes {($($_:tt)*) => {}}
lexes!(🐛"foo");
```
Before, invalid emoji identifiers were gated during parsing instead of lexing in all cases, but this didn't account for macro expansion of literal prefixes.
Fix#123696.
That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and
`untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than
half of the compiler has be converted to use translated diagnostics.
This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow`
attributes, which proves that this change is warranted.
After seeing a `0`, if it's followed by any of `[0-9]`, `_`, `.`, `e`,
or `E`, we consume all the digits. But in the `.`, `e` and `E` cases
this is pointless because we know there aren't any digits.
Reverts PR #108031
Fixes (doesnt close until beta backported) #109746
This reverts commit e3f9db5fc319c6d8eee5d47d216ea6a426070c41.
This reverts commit 98b82aedba3f3f581e89df54352914b27f42c6f7.
This reverts commit 380fa264132ad481e73cbbf0f3a0feefd99a1d78.
Note that at the time of this commit, `unic-emoji-char` seems to have
data tables only up to Unicode 5.0, but Unicode is already newer than
this.
A newer emoji such as `🥺` will not be recognized as an emoji
but older emojis such as `🐱` will.
