Extract some shared code from codegen backend target feature handling
There's a bunch of code duplication between the GCC and LLVM backends in target feature handling. This moves that into new shared helper functions in `rustc_codegen_ssa`.
The first two commits should be purely refactoring. I am fairly sure the LLVM-side behavior stays the same; if the GCC side deliberately diverges from this then I may have missed that. I did account for one divergence, which I do not know is deliberate or not: GCC does not seem to use the `-Ctarget-feature` flag to populate `cfg(target_feature)`. That seems odd, since the `-Ctarget-feature` flag is used to populate the return value of `global_gcc_features` which controls the target features actually used by GCC. ``@GuillaumeGomez`` ``@antoyo`` is there a reason `target_config` ignores `-Ctarget-feature` but `global_gcc_features` does not? The second commit also cleans up a bunch of unneeded complexity added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135927.
The third commit extracts some shared logic out of the functions that populate `cfg(target_feature)` and the backend target feature set, respectively. This one actually has some slight functional changes:
- Before, with `-Ctarget-feature=-feat`, if there is some other feature `x` that implies `feat` we would *not* add `-x` to the backend target feature set. Now, we do. This fixesrust-lang/rust#134792.
- The logic that removes `x` from `cfg(target_feature)` in this case also changed a bit, avoiding a large number of calls to the (uncached) `sess.target.implied_target_features` (if there were a large number of positive features listed before a negative feature) but instead constructing a full inverse implication map when encountering the first negative feature. Ideally this would be done with queries but the backend target feature logic runs before `tcx` so we can't use that...
- Previously, if feature "a" implied "b" and "b" was unstable, then using `-Ctarget-feature=+a` would also emit a warning about `b`. I had to remove this since when accounting for negative implications, this emits a ton of warnings in a bunch of existing tests... I assume this was unintentional anyway.
The fourth commit increases consistency of the GCC backend with the LLVM backend.
The last commit does some further cleanup:
- Get rid of RUSTC_SPECIAL_FEATURES. It was only needed for s390x "backchain", but since LLVM 19 that is always a regular target feature so we don't need this hack any more. The hack also has various unintended side-effects so we don't want to keep it. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142412.
- Move RUSTC_SPECIFIC_FEATURES handling into the shared parse_rust_feature_flag helper so all consumers of `-Ctarget-feature` that only care about actual target features (and not "crt-static") have it. Previously, we actually set `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` twice: once in the backend target feature logic, and once specifically for that one feature. IIUC, some targets are meant to ignore `-Ctarget-feature=+crt-static`, it seems like before this PR that flag still incorrectly enabled `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` (but I didn't test this).
- Move fixed_x18 handling together with retpoline handling.
- Forbid setting fixed_x18 as a regular target feature, even unstably. It must be set via the `-Z` flag.
``@bjorn3`` I did not touch the cranelift backend here, since AFAIK it doesn't really support target features. But if you ever do, please use the new helpers. :)
Cc ``@workingjubilee``
Move metadata object generation for dylibs to the linker code
This deduplicates some code between codegen backends and may in the future allow adding extra metadata that is only known at link time.
Prerequisite of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96708.
simd intrinsics with mask: accept unsigned integer masks, and fix some of the errors
It's not clear at all why the mask would have to be signed, it is anyway interpreted bitwise. The backend should just make sure that works no matter the surface-level type; our LLVM backend already does this correctly. The note of "the mask may be widened, which only has the correct behavior for signed integers" explains... nothing? Why can't the code do the widening correctly? If necessary, just cast to the signed type first...
Also while we are at it, fix the errors. For simd_masked_load/store, the errors talked about the "third argument" but they meant the first argument (the mask is the first argument there). They also used the wrong type for `expected_element`.
I have extremely low confidence in the GCC part of this PR.
See [discussion on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/257879-project-portable-simd/topic/On.20the.20sign.20of.20masks)
Autodiff Upstreaming - rustc_codegen_ssa, rustc_middle
This PR should not be merged until the rustc_codegen_llvm part is merged.
I will also alter it a little based on what get's shaved off from the cg_llvm PR,
and address some of the feedback I received in the other PR (including cleanups).
I am putting it already up to
1) Discuss with `@jieyouxu` if there is more work needed to add tests to this and
2) Pray that there is someone reviewing who can tell me why some of my autodiff invocations get lost.
Re 1: My test require fat-lto. I also modify the compilation pipeline. So if there are any other llvm-ir tests in the same compilation unit then I will likely break them. Luckily there are two groups who currently have the same fat-lto requirement for their GPU code which I have for my autodiff code and both groups have some plans to enable support for thin-lto. Once either that work pans out, I'll copy it over for this feature. I will also work on not changing the optimization pipeline for functions not differentiated, but that will require some thoughts and engineering, so I think it would be good to be able to run the autodiff tests isolated from the rest for now. Can you guide me here please?
For context, here are some of my tests in the samples folder: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rustbook
Re 2: This is a pretty serious issue, since it effectively prevents publishing libraries making use of autodiff: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rust/issues/173. For some reason my dummy code persists till the end, so the code which calls autodiff, deletes the dummy, and inserts the code to compute the derivative never gets executed. To me it looks like the rustc_autodiff attribute just get's dropped, but I don't know WHY? Any help would be super appreciated, as rustc queries look a bit voodoo to me.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
r? `@jieyouxu`
Target option to require explicit cpu
Some targets have many different CPUs and no generic CPU that can be used as a default. For these targets, the user needs to explicitly specify a CPU through `-C target-cpu=`.
Add an option for targets and an error message if no CPU is set.
This affects the proposed amdgpu and avr targets.
amdgpu tracking issue: #135024
AVR MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/800
Some targets have many different CPUs and no generic CPU that can be
used as a default. For these targets, the user needs to explicitly
specify a CPU through `-C target-cpu=`.
Add an option for targets and an error message if no CPU is set.
This affects the proposed amdgpu and avr targets.
bootstrap/codegen_ssa: ship llvm-strip and use it for -Cstrip
Fixes#131206.
- Includes `llvm-strip` (a symlink to `llvm-objcopy`) in the compiler dist artifact so that it can be used for `-Cstrip` instead of the system tooling.
- Uses `llvm-strip` instead of `/usr/bin/strip` for macOS. macOS needs a specific linker and the system one is preferred, hence #130781 but that doesn't work when cross-compiling, so use the `llvm-strip` utility instead.
cc #123151
mark some target features as 'forbidden' so they cannot be (un)set with -Ctarget-feature
The context for this is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344: some target features change the way floats are passed between functions. Changing those target features is unsound as code compiled for the same target may now use different ABIs.
So this introduces a new concept of "forbidden" target features (on top of the existing "stable " and "unstable" categories), and makes it a hard error to (un)set such a target feature. For now, the x86 and ARM feature `soft-float` is on that list. We'll have to make some effort to collect more relevant features, and similar features from other targets, but that can happen after the basic infrastructure for this landed. (These features are being collected in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131799.)
I've made this a warning for now to give people some time to speak up if this would break something.
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/780
codegen_ssa: consolidate tied target checks
Fixes#105110.
Fixes#105111.
`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This PR consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the `codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions, as would be expected.
Also adds a test confirming that enabling one tied feature doesn't imply another - the appropriate error for this was already being emitted. I did a bisect and narrowed it down to two patches it was likely to be - something in #128796, probably #128221 or #128679.
`rustc_codegen_llvm` and `rustc_codegen_gcc` duplicated logic for
checking if tied target features were partially enabled. This commit
consolidates these checks into `rustc_codegen_ssa` in the
`codegen_fn_attrs` query, which also is run pre-monomorphisation for
each function, which ensures that this check is run for unused functions,
as would be expected.
Make create_dll_import_lib easier to implement
This will make it easier to implement raw-dylib support in cg_clif and cg_gcc. This PR doesn't yet include an create_dll_import_lib implementation for cg_clif as I need to correctly implement dllimport in cg_clif first before raw-dylib can work at all with cg_clif.
Required for https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_cranelift/issues/1345
Currently the output on failure is as follows:
Compiling block-buffer v0.10.4
Compiling crypto-common v0.1.6
Compiling digest v0.10.7
Compiling sha2 v0.10.8
Compiling xz2 v0.1.7
error: failed to build archive: No such file or directory
error: could not compile `bootstrap` (lib) due to 1 previous error
Print which file is being constructed to give some hint about what is
going on.
stabilize combining +bundle and +whole-archive link modifiers
Per discussion on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108081 combining +bundle and +whole-archive already works and can be stabilized independently of other aspects of the packed_bundled_libs feature. There is no risk of regression because this was not previously allowed.
r? `@petrochenkov`
