Errors in `DiagCtxtInner::emit_diagnostic` are never set to
`Level::Bug`, because the condition never succeeds, because
`self.treat_err_as_bug()` is called *before* the error counts are
incremented.
This commit switches to `self.treat_next_err_as_bug()`, fixing the
problem. This changes the error message output to actually say "internal
compiler error".
Silence some follow-up errors [1/x]
this is one piece of the requested cleanups from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117449
When we use `-> impl SomeTrait<_>` as a return type, we are both using the "infer return type suggestion" code path, and the infer opaque type code path within the same function. That can lead to confusing diagnostics, so silence all opaque type diagnostics in that case.
rustdoc: offset generic args of cross-crate trait object types when cleaning
Fixes#119529.
This PR contains several refactorings apart from the bug fix.
Best reviewed commit by commit.
r? GuillaumeGomez
Avoid silencing relevant follow-up errors
r? `@matthewjasper`
This PR only adds new errors to tests that are already failing and fixes one ICE.
Several tests were changed to not emit new errors. I believe all of them were faulty tests, and not explicitly testing for the code that had new errors.
`~const` trait and projection bounds do not imply their non-const counterparts
This PR removes the hack where we install a non-const trait and projection bound for every `const_trait` and `~const` projection bound we have in the AST. It ends up messing up more things than it fixes, see words below.
Fixes#119718
cc `@fmease` `@fee1-dead` `@oli-obk`
r? fee1-dead or one of y'all i don't care
---
My understanding is that this hack was added to support the following code:
```rust
pub trait Owo<X = <Self as Uwu>::T> {}
#[const_trait]
pub trait Uwu: Owo {}
```
Which is concretely lifted from in the `FromResidual` and `Try` traits. Since within the param-env of `trait Uwu`, we only know that `Self: ~const Uwu` and not `Self: Uwu`, the projection `<Self as Uwu>::T` is not satsifyable.
This causes problems such as #119718, since instantiations of `FnDef` types coming from `const fn` really do **only** implement one of `FnOnce` or `const FnOnce`!
---
In the long-term, I believe that such code should really look something more like:
```rust
#[const_trait]
pub trait Owo<X = <Self as ~const Uwu>::T> {}
#[const_trait]
pub trait Uwu: Owo {}
```
... and that we should introduce some sort of `<T as ~const Foo>::Bar` bound syntax, since due to the fact that `~const` bounds can be present in item bounds, e.g.
```rust
#[const_trait] trait Foo { type Bar: ~const Destruct; }
```
It's easy to see that `<T as Foo>::Bar` and `<T as ~const Foo>::Bar` (or `<T as const Foo>::Bar`) can be distinct types with distinct item bounds!
**Admission**: I know I've said before that I don't like `~const` projection syntax, I do at this point believe they're necessary to fully express bounds and types in a maybe-const world.
Merge dead bb pruning and unreachable bb deduplication.
Both routines share the same basic structure: iterate on all bbs to identify work, and then renumber bbs.
We can do both at once.
unify query canonicalization mode
Exclude from canonicalization only the static lifetimes that appear in the param env because of #118965 . Any other occurrence can be canonicalized safely AFAICT.
r? `@lcnr`
Support async recursive calls (as long as they have indirection)
Before #101692, we stored coroutine witness types directly inside of the coroutine. That means that a coroutine could not contain itself (as a witness field) without creating a cycle in the type representation of the coroutine, which we detected with the `OpaqueTypeExpander`, which is used to detect cycles when expanding opaque types after that are inferred to contain themselves.
After `-Zdrop-tracking-mir` was stabilized, we no longer store these generator witness fields directly, but instead behind a def-id based query. That means there is no technical obstacle in the compiler preventing coroutines from containing themselves per se, other than the fact that for a coroutine to have a non-infinite layout, it must contain itself wrapped in a layer of allocation indirection (like a `Box`).
This means that it should be valid for this code to work:
```
async fn async_fibonacci(i: u32) -> u32 {
if i == 0 || i == 1 {
i
} else {
Box::pin(async_fibonacci(i - 1)).await
+ Box::pin(async_fibonacci(i - 2)).await
}
}
```
Whereas previously, you'd need to coerce the future to `Pin<Box<dyn Future<Output = ...>>` before `await`ing it, to prevent the async's desugared coroutine from containing itself across as await point.
This PR does two things:
1. Only report an error if an opaque expansion cycle is detected *not* through coroutine witness fields.
* Instead, if we find an opaque cycle through coroutine witness fields, we compute the layout of the coroutine. If that results in a cycle error, we report it as a recursive async fn.
4. Reworks the way we report layout errors having to do with coroutines, to make up for the diagnostic regressions introduced by (1.). We actually do even better now, pointing out the call sites of the recursion!
Adding alignment to the cases to test for specific error messages.
Adding alignment to the list of cases to test for specific error message. Covers `>`, `^` and `<`.
Pinging people who chimed in last time ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106805 ): ``@estebank`` , ``@compiler-errors`` and ``@Nilstrieb``
tests: Normalize `\r\n` to `\n` in some run-make tests
The output is produced by printf from C code in these cases, and printf prints in text mode, which means `\n` will be printed as `\r\n` on Windows.
In --bless mode the new output with `\r\n` will replace expected output in `tests/run-make/raw-dylib-*\output.txt` files, which use \n, always resulting in dirty files in the repo.
remove an unnecessary stderr-per-bitwidth
also update some regexp, `a(lloc)?` would no longer match now that we have compiletest itself do alloc ID normalization.
r? ````@oli-obk````
coverage: `llvm-cov` expects column numbers to be bytes, not code points
Normally the compiler emits column numbers as a 1-based number of Unicode code points.
But when we embed coverage mappings for `-Cinstrument-coverage`, those mappings will ultimately be read by the `llvm-cov` tool. That tool assumes that column numbers are 1-based numbers of *bytes*, and relies on that assumption when slicing up source code to apply highlighting (in HTML reports, and in text-based reports with colour).
For the very common case of all-ASCII source code, bytes and code points are the same, so the difference isn't noticeable. But for code that contains non-ASCII characters, emitting column numbers as code points will result in `llvm-cov` slicing strings in the wrong places, producing mangled output or fatal errors.
(See https://github.com/taiki-e/cargo-llvm-cov/issues/275 as an example of what can go wrong.)
Improved support of collapse_debuginfo attribute for macros.
Added walk_chain_collapsed function to consider collapse_debuginfo attribute in parent macros in call chain.
Fixed collapse_debuginfo attribute processing for cranelift (there was if/else branches error swap).
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100758
Unions are not `PointerLike`
I introduced the `PointerLike` trait to enforce `dyn*` coercions only from types that share the same ABI as a pointer. On top of needing to be scalar, they also should not be unions, since CTFE chokes on scalar reads for union types.
Fixes#119695
Impl trait diagnostic tweaks
1. Tweak some names for `impl Trait` being used in the wrong position
2. Remove two helper functions that are no longer needed since RPITIT is stable, and which causes matches to be a bit obtuse.
3. Split and fix the part where the error notes that it's "only allowed in XX"
Fixes#119629
Rewrite `pin` module documentation to clarify usage and invariants
The documentation of `pin` today does not give a complete treatment of pinning from first principles, nor does it adequately help build intuition and understanding for how the different elements of the pinning story fit together.
This rewrite attempts to address these in a way that makes the concept more approachable while also making the documentation more normative.
This PR picks up where `@mcy` left off in #88500 (thanks to him for the original work and `@Manishearth` for mentioning it such that I originally found it). I've directly incorporated much of the feedback left on the original PR and have rewritten and changed some of the main conceits of the prose to better adhere to the feedback from the reviewers on that PR or just explain something in (hopefully) a better way.
