Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142458 (Merge unboxed trait object error suggestion into regular dyn incompat error)
- rust-lang/rust#142593 (Add a warning to LateContext::get_def_path)
- rust-lang/rust#142594 (Add DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral)
- rust-lang/rust#142740 (Clean-up `FnCtxt::is_destruct_assignment_desugaring`)
- rust-lang/rust#142780 (Port `#[must_use]` to new attribute parsing infrastructure)
- rust-lang/rust#142798 (Don't fail to parse a struct if a semicolon is used to separate fields)
- rust-lang/rust#142856 (Add a few inline directives in rustc_serialize.)
- rust-lang/rust#142868 (remove few allow(dead_code))
- rust-lang/rust#142874 (cranelift: fix target feature name typo: "fxsr")
- rust-lang/rust#142877 (Document why tidy checks if `eslint` is installed via `npm`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral
Implements `DesugaringKind::FormatLiteral` to mark the FormatArgs desugaring of format literals. The main use for this is to stop yapping about about formatting parameters if we're not anywhere near a format literal. The other use case is to fix suggestions such as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141350. It might also be useful for new or existing diagnostics that check whether they're in a format-like macro.
cc `@xizheyin` `@fmease`
completely deduplicate `Visitor` and `MutVisitor`
r? oli-obk
This closesrust-lang/rust#127615.
### Discussion
> * Give every `MutVisitor::visit_*` method a corresponding `flat_map_*` method.
Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be mapped to multiple instances of themselves. Not every AST node exists in a location where they can be removed from existence (e.g. `filter_map_expr`). I don't think this is doable.
> * Give every `MutVisitor::visit_*` method a corresponding `Visitor` method and vice versa
The only three remaining method-level asymmetries after this PR are `visit_stmt` and `visit_nested_use_tree` (only on `Visitor`) and `visit_span` (only on `MutVisitor`).
`visit_stmt` doesn't seem applicable to `MutVisitor` because `walk_flat_map_stmt_kind` will ask `flat_map_item` / `filter_map_expr` to potentially turn a single `Stmt` to multiple based on what a visitor wants. So only using `flat_map_stmt` seems appropriate.
`visit_nested_use_tree` is used for `rustc_resolve` to track stuff. Not useful for `MutVisitor` for now.
`visit_span` is currently not used for `MutVisitor` already, it was just kept in case we want to revive rust-lang/rust#127241. cc `@cjgillot` maybe we could remove for now and re-insert later if we find a use-case? It does involve some extra effort to maintain.
* Remaining FIXMEs
`visit_lifetime` has an extra param for `Visitor` that's not in `MutVisitor`. This is again something only used by `rustc_resolve`. I think we can keep that symmetry for now.
Change __rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable to be a function
This fixes a long sequence of issues:
1. A customer reported that building for Arm64EC was broken: #138541
2. This was caused by a bug in my original implementation of Arm64EC support, namely that only functions on Arm64EC need to be decorated with `#` but Rust was decorating statics as well.
3. Once I corrected Rust to only decorate functions, I started linking failures where the linker couldn't find statics exported by dylib dependencies. This was caused by the compiler not marking exported statics in the generated DEF file with `DATA`, thus they were being exported as functions not data.
4. Once I corrected the way that the DEF files were being emitted, the linker started failing saying that it couldn't find `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable`. This is because the MSVC linker requires the declarations of statics imported from other dylibs to be marked with `dllimport` (whereas it will happily link to functions imported from other dylibs whether they are marked `dllimport` or not).
5. I then made a change to ensure that `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` was marked as `dllimport`, but the MSVC linker started emitting warnings that `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` was marked as `dllimport` but was declared in an obj file. This is a harmless warning which is a performance hint: anything that's marked `dllimport` must be indirected via an `__imp` symbol so I added a linker arg in the target to suppress the warning.
6. A customer then reported a similar warning when using `lld-link` (<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140176#issuecomment-2872448443>). I don't think it was an implementation difference between the two linkers but rather that, depending on the obj that the declaration versus uses of `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` landed in we would get different warnings, so I suppressed that warning as well: #140954.
7. Another customer reported that they weren't using the Rust compiler to invoke the linker, thus these warnings were breaking their build: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140176#issuecomment-2881867433>. At that point, my original change was reverted (#141024) leaving Arm64EC broken yet again.
Taking a step back, a lot of these linker issues arise from the fact that `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` is marked as `extern "Rust"` in the standard library and, therefore, assumed to be a foreign item from a different crate BUT the Rust compiler may choose to generate it either in the current crate, some other crate that will be statically linked in OR some other crate that will by dynamically imported.
Worse yet, it is impossible while building a given crate to know if `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` will statically linked or dynamically imported: it might be that one of its dependent crates is the one with an allocator kind set and thus that crate (which is compiled later) will decide depending if it has any dylib dependencies or not to import `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` or generate it. Thus, there is no way to know if the declaration of `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` should be marked with `dllimport` or not.
There is a simple fix for all this: there is no reason `__rust_no_alloc_shim_is_unstable` must be a static. It needs to be some symbol that must be linked in; thus, it could easily be a function instead. As a function, there is no need to mark it as `dllimport` when dynamically imported which avoids the entire mess above.
There may be a perf hit for changing the `volatile load` to be a `tail call`, so I'm happy to change that part back (although I question what the codegen of a `volatile load` would look like, and if the backend is going to try to use load-acquire semantics).
Build with this change applied BEFORE #140176 was reverted to demonstrate that there are no linking issues with either MSVC or MinGW: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/15078657205>
Incidentally, I fixed `tests/run-make/no-alloc-shim` to work with MSVC as I needed it to be able to test locally (FYI for #128602)
r? `@bjorn3`
cc `@jieyouxu`
Reduce precedence of expressions that have an outer attr
Previously, `-Zunpretty=expanded` would expand this program as follows:
```rust
#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]
macro_rules! repro {
($e:expr) => {
#[allow(deprecated)] $e
};
}
#[derive(Default)]
struct Thing {
#[deprecated]
field: i32,
}
fn main() {
let thing = Thing::default();
let _ = repro!(thing).field;
}
```
```rs
#![feature(prelude_import)]
#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]
#[prelude_import]
use std::prelude::rust_2021::*;
#[macro_use]
extern crate std;
struct Thing {
#[deprecated]
field: i32,
}
#[automatically_derived]
impl ::core::default::Default for Thing {
#[inline]
fn default() -> Thing {
Thing { field: ::core::default::Default::default() }
}
}
fn main() {
let thing = Thing::default();
let _ = #[allow(deprecated)] thing.field;
}
```
This is not the correct expansion. The correct output would have `(#[allow(deprecated)] thing).field` with the attribute applying only to `thing`, not to `thing.field`.
Introduce `-Zmacro-stats`
Introduce `-Zmacro-stats`.
It collects data about macro expansions and prints them in a table after expansion finishes. It's very useful for detecting macro bloat, especially for proc macros.
r? `@petrochenkov`
Implement asymmetrical precedence for closures and jumps
I have been through a series of asymmetrical precedence designs in Syn, and finally have one that I like and is worth backporting into rustc. It is based on just 2 bits of state: `next_operator_can_begin_expr` and `next_operator_can_continue_expr`.
Asymmetrical precedence is the thing that enables `(return 1) + 1` to require parentheses while `1 + return 1` does not, despite `+` always having stronger precedence than `return` [according to the Rust Reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.83.0/reference/expressions.html#expression-precedence). This is facilitated by `next_operator_can_continue_expr`.
Relatedly, it is the thing that enables `(return) - 1` to require parentheses while `return + 1` does not, despite `+` and `-` having exactly the same precedence. This is facilitated by `next_operator_can_begin_expr`.
**Example:**
```rust
macro_rules! repro {
($e:expr) => {
$e - $e;
$e + $e;
};
}
fn main() {
repro!{return}
repro!{return 1}
}
```
`-Zunpretty=expanded` **Before:**
```console
fn main() {
(return) - (return);
(return) + (return);
(return 1) - (return 1);
(return 1) + (return 1);
}
```
**After:**
```console
fn main() {
(return) - return;
return + return;
(return 1) - return 1;
(return 1) + return 1;
}
```
Fix incorrect eq_unspanned in TokenStream
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141522
r? ``@workingjubilee``
should we remove this function?
since it's used in several places, i'd prefer to keep it.
Remove `Path::is_ident`.
It checks that a path has a single segment that matches the given symbol, and that there are zero generic arguments. It has a single use.
We also have `impl PartialEq<Symbol> for Path` which does exactly the same thing *except* it doesn't check for zero generic arguments, which seems like an oversight. It has numerous uses.
This commit removes `Path::is_ident`, adds a test for zero generic arguments to `PartialEq<Symbol> for Path`, and changes the single use of `is_ident` to instead use `==`.
r? `@wesleywiser`
fix(#141141): When expanding `PartialEq`, check equality of scalar types first.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#141141.
Now, `cs_eq` function of `partial_eq.rs` compares [scalar types](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rust-by-example/primitives.html#scalar-types) first.
- Add `is_scalar` field to `FieldInfo`.
- Add `is_scalar` method to `TyKind`.
- Pass `FieldInfo` via `CsFold::Combine` and refactor code relying on it.
- Implement `TryFrom<&str>` and `TryFrom<Symbol>` for FloatTy.
- Implement `TryFrom<&str>` and `TryFrom<Symbol>` for IntTy.
- Implement `TryFrom<&str>` and `TryFrom<Symbol>` for UintTy.
It checks that a path has a single segment that matches the given
symbol, and that there are zero generic arguments. It has a single use.
We also have `impl PartialEq<Symbol> for Path` which does exactly the
same thing *except* it doesn't check for zero generic arguments, which
seems like an oversight. It has numerous uses.
This commit removes `Path::is_ident`, adds a test for zero generic
arguments to `PartialEq<Symbol> for Path`, and changes the single use of
`is_ident` to instead use `==`.
This helps with efforts to deduplicate the `MutVisitor` and the
`Visitor` code. All users of `Visitor`'s methods that have extra
`NodeId` as parameters really just want to visit the id on its
own.
Also includes some methods deduplicated and cleaned up as
a result of this change.
remove `visit_clobber` and move `DummyAstNode` to `rustc_expand`
`visit_clobber` is not really useful except for one niche purpose
involving generic code. We should just use the replace logic where we
can.
Reorder `ast::ItemKind::{Struct,Enum,Union}` fields.
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
<-><----> <------------>
/ | \
ident generics variant_data
```
r? `@fee1-dead`
So they match the order of the parts in the source code, e.g.:
```
struct Foo<T, U> { t: T, u: U }
<-><----> <------------>
/ | \
ident generics variant_data
```
`mut_visit.rs` has a single function with a `noop_` prefix:
`noop_filter_map_expr`. This commit renames as `walk_filter_map_expr`
which is consistent with other functions in this file.
The commit also removes out-of-date comments that refer to `noop_*`
methods.
