rust/tests/ui/check-cfg/cargo-build-script.stderr
Celina G. Val 2c4923e6bc Update test output to include check_contracts cfg
This is now a valid expected value.
2025-02-03 13:55:15 -08:00

44 lines
1.9 KiB
Plaintext

warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_foo`
--> $DIR/cargo-build-script.rs:10:7
|
LL | #[cfg(has_foo)]
| ^^^^^^^
|
= help: expected names are: `has_bar` and 31 more
= help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
= help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_foo)'] }
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
= note: `#[warn(unexpected_cfgs)]` on by default
warning: unexpected `cfg` condition name: `has_foo`
--> $DIR/cargo-build-script.rs:14:7
|
LL | #[cfg(has_foo = "yes")]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
= help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_foo, values("yes"))'] }
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
warning: unexpected `cfg` condition value: `yes`
--> $DIR/cargo-build-script.rs:18:7
|
LL | #[cfg(has_bar = "yes")]
| ^^^^^^^--------
| |
| help: remove the value
|
= note: no expected value for `has_bar`
= help: consider using a Cargo feature instead
= help: or consider adding in `Cargo.toml` the `check-cfg` lint config for the lint:
[lints.rust]
unexpected_cfgs = { level = "warn", check-cfg = ['cfg(has_bar, values("yes"))'] }
= note: see <https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/check-cfg/cargo-specifics.html> for more information about checking conditional configuration
warning: 3 warnings emitted