rust/tests/ui/feature-gates/feature-gate-more-maybe-bounds.rs
León Orell Valerian Liehr cdc3d701cb
Don't reject *multiple* relaxed bounds, reject *duplicate* ones.
Having multiple relaxed bounds like `?Sized + ?Iterator` is actually *fine*.
We actually want to reject *duplicate* relaxed bounds like `?Sized + ?Sized`
because these most certainly represent a user error.

Note that this doesn't mean that we accept more code because a bound like
`?Iterator` is still invalid as it's not relaxing a *default* trait and
the only way to define / use more default bounds is under the experimental
and internal feature `more_maybe_bounds` plus `lang_items` plus unstable
flag `-Zexperimental-default-bounds` (historical context: for the longest
time, bounds like `?Iterator` were actually allowed and lead to a hard
warning).

Ultimately, this simply *reframes* the diagnostic. The scope of
`more_maybe_bounds` / `-Zexperimental-default-bounds` remains unchanged
as well.
2025-07-18 12:24:56 +02:00

15 lines
521 B
Rust

#![feature(auto_traits)]
trait Trait1 {}
auto trait Trait2 {}
trait Trait3: ?Trait1 {} //~ ERROR relaxed bounds are not permitted in supertrait bounds
trait Trait4 where Self: ?Trait1 {} //~ ERROR this relaxed bound is not permitted here
fn foo(_: Box<dyn Trait1 + ?Trait2>) {}
//~^ ERROR relaxed bounds are not permitted in trait object types
fn bar<T: ?Trait1 + ?Trait2>(_: T) {}
//~^ ERROR bound modifier `?` can only be applied to `Sized`
//~| ERROR bound modifier `?` can only be applied to `Sized`
fn main() {}