rust/tests/ui/precondition-checks/vec-from-parts.rs
Martin Nordholts e1d4f2a0c2 tests: Require run-fail ui tests to have an exit code (SIGABRT not ok)
And introduce two new directives for ui tests:
* `run-crash`
* `run-fail-or-crash`

Normally a `run-fail` ui test like tests that panic shall not be
terminated by a signal like `SIGABRT`. So begin having that as a hard
requirement.

Some of our current tests do terminate by a signal/crash however.
Introduce and use `run-crash` for those tests. Note that Windows crashes
are not handled by signals but by certain high bits set on the process
exit code. Example exit code for crash on Windows: `0xc000001d`.
Because of this, we define "crash" on all platforms as "not exit with
success and not exit with a regular failure code in the range 1..=127".

Some tests behave differently on different targets:
* Targets without unwind support will abort (crash) instead of exit with
  failure code 101 after panicking. As a special case, allow crashes for
  `run-fail` tests for such targets.
* Different sanitizer implementations handle detected memory problems
  differently. Some abort (crash) the process while others exit with
  failure code 1. Introduce and use `run-fail-or-crash` for such tests.
2025-07-19 18:44:07 +02:00

16 lines
456 B
Rust

//@ run-crash
//@ compile-flags: -Cdebug-assertions=yes
//@ error-pattern: unsafe precondition(s) violated: Vec::from_parts_in requires that length <= capacity
#![feature(allocator_api)]
use std::ptr::NonNull;
fn main() {
let ptr: NonNull<i32> = std::ptr::NonNull::dangling();
// Test Vec::from_parts_in with length > capacity
unsafe {
let alloc = std::alloc::Global;
let _vec = Vec::from_parts_in(ptr, 10, 5, alloc);
}
}