Andre Bogus 41da875fae Add Option::as_slice(_mut)
This adds the following functions:

* `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]`
* `Option<T>::as_slice_mut(&mut self) -> &[T]`

The `as_slice` and `as_slice_mut` functions benefit from an
optimization that makes them completely branch-free.

Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either
the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero
or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of
`Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
2023-03-01 00:05:31 +01:00
..
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-11 20:42:13 -05:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-02-18 21:35:02 +00:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-02-14 19:21:58 -05:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-03-01 00:05:31 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-02-14 19:21:58 -05:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00
2023-01-17 16:23:22 +01:00

The files here use the LLVM FileCheck framework, documented at https://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/FileCheck.html.

One extension worth noting is the use of revisions as custom prefixes for FileCheck. If your codegen test has different behavior based on the chosen target or different compiler flags that you want to exercise, you can use a revisions annotation, like so:

// revisions: aaa bbb
// [bbb] compile-flags: --flags-for-bbb

After specifying those variations, you can write different expected, or explicitly unexpected output by using <prefix>-SAME: and <prefix>-NOT:, like so:

// CHECK: expected code
// aaa-SAME: emitted-only-for-aaa
// aaa-NOT:                        emitted-only-for-bbb
// bbb-NOT:  emitted-only-for-aaa
// bbb-SAME:                       emitted-only-for-bbb