tokio/examples
Eliza Weisman b9e3d2edde
task: add Tracing instrumentation to spawned tasks (#2655)
## Motivation

When debugging asynchronous systems, it can be very valuable to inspect
what tasks are currently active (see #2510). The [`tracing` crate] and
related libraries provide an interface for Rust libraries and
applications to emit and consume structured, contextual, and async-aware
diagnostic information. Because this diagnostic information is
structured and machine-readable, it is a better fit for the
task-tracking use case than textual logging — `tracing` spans can be
consumed to generate metrics ranging from a simple counter of active
tasks to histograms of poll durations, idle durations, and total task
lifetimes. This information is potentially valuable to both Tokio users
*and* to maintainers.

Additionally, `tracing` is maintained by the Tokio project and is
becoming widely adopted by other libraries in the "Tokio stack", such as
[`hyper`], [`h2`], and [`tonic`] and in [other] [parts] of the broader Rust
ecosystem. Therefore, it is suitable for use in Tokio itself.

[`tracing` crate]: https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing
[`hyper`]: https://github.com/hyperium/hyper/pull/2204
[`h2`]: https://github.com/hyperium/h2/pull/475
[`tonic`]: 570c606397/tonic/Cargo.toml (L48)
[other]: https://github.com/rust-lang/chalk/pull/525
[parts]: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/331

## Solution

This PR is an MVP for instrumenting Tokio with `tracing` spans. When the
"tracing" optional dependency is enabled, every spawned future will be
instrumented with a `tracing` span.

The generated spans are at the `TRACE` verbosity level, and have the
target "tokio::task", which may be used by consumers to filter whether
they should be recorded. They include fields for the type name of the
spawned future and for what kind of task the span corresponds to (a
standard `spawn`ed task, a local task spawned by `spawn_local`, or a
`blocking` task spawned by `spawn_blocking`). Because `tracing` has
separate concepts of "opening/closing" and "entering/exiting" a span, we
enter these spans every time the spawned task is polled. This allows
collecting data such as:

 - the total lifetime of the task from `spawn` to `drop`
 - the number of times the task was polled before it completed
 - the duration of each individual time that the span was polled (and
   therefore, aggregated metrics like histograms or averages of poll
   durations)
 - the total time a span was actively being polled, and the total time
   it was alive but **not** being polled
 - the time between when the task was `spawn`ed and the first poll

As an example, here is the output of a version of the `chat` example
instrumented with `tracing`:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2796466/87231927-e50f6900-c36f-11ea-8a90-6da9b93b9601.png)
And, with multiple connections actually sending messages:
![trace_example_1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2796466/87231876-8d70fd80-c36f-11ea-91f1-0ad1a5b3112f.png)


I haven't added any `tracing` spans in the example, only converted the
existing `println!`s to `tracing::info` and `tracing::error` for
consistency. The span durations in the above output are generated by
`tracing-subscriber`. Of course, a Tokio-specific subscriber could
generate even more detailed statistics, but that's follow-up work once
basic tracing support has been added.

Note that the `Instrumented` type from `tracing-futures`, which attaches
a `tracing` span to a future, was reimplemented inside of Tokio to avoid
a dependency on that crate. `tracing-futures` has a feature flag that
enables an optional dependency on Tokio, and I believe that if another
crate in a dependency graph enables that feature while Tokio's `tracing`
support is also enabled, it would create a circular dependency that
Cargo wouldn't be able to handle. Also, it avoids a dependency for a
very small amount of code that is unlikely to ever change.

There is, of course, room for plenty of future work here. This might 
include:

 - instrumenting other parts of `tokio`, such as I/O resources and 
   channels (possibly via waker instrumentation)
 - instrumenting the threadpool so that the state of worker threads
   can be inspected
 - writing `tracing-subscriber` `Layer`s to collect and display
   Tokio-specific data from these traces
 - using `track_caller` (when it's stable) to record _where_ a task 
   was `spawn`ed from

However, this is intended as an MVP to get us started on that path.

Signed-off-by: Eliza Weisman <eliza@buoyant.io>
2020-07-13 16:46:59 -07:00
..
2019-12-18 19:54:06 -05:00
2020-02-11 10:56:32 -05:00

Examples of how to use Tokio

This directory contains a number of examples showcasing various capabilities of the tokio crate.

All examples can be executed with:

cargo run --example $name

A good starting point for the examples would be hello_world and echo. Additionally the tokio website contains additional guides for some of the examples.

For a larger "real world" example, see the mini-redis repository.

If you've got an example you'd like to see here, please feel free to open an issue. Otherwise if you've got an example you'd like to add, please feel free to make a PR!