Doing so can cause us to duplicate navigation targets for the same ranges which breaks convenience features of some editors where go to def can trigger find all references
I'm joking, but now that the def map is the only thing that uses the item tree, we can remove a lot of things from it that aren't needed for the def map.
Item tree IDs are very unstable (adding an item of a kind invalidates all following items of the same kind). Instead use ast ids, which, since the previous commit, are pretty stable.
Instead of simple numbering, we hash important bits, like the name of the item.
This will allow for much better incrementality, e.g. when you add an item. Currently, this invalidates the IDs of all following items, which invalidates pretty much everything.
Add (back) `unsupported_calling_conventions` lint to reject more invalid calling conventions
This adds back the `unsupported_calling_conventions` lint that was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129935, in order to start the process of dealing with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137018. Specifically, we are going for the plan laid out [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/137018#issuecomment-2672118326):
- thiscall, stdcall, fastcall, cdecl should only be accepted on x86-32
- vectorcall should only be accepted on x86-32 and x86-64
The difference to the status quo is that:
- We stop accepting stdcall, fastcall on targets that are windows && non-x86-32 (we already don't accept these on targets that are non-windows && non-x86-32)
- We stop accepting cdecl on targets that are non-x86-32
- (There is no difference for thiscall, this was already a hard error on non-x86-32)
- We stop accepting vectorcall on targets that are windows && non-x86-*
Vectorcall is an unstable ABI so we can just make this a hard error immediately. The others are stable, so we emit the `unsupported_calling_conventions` forward-compat lint. I set up the lint to show up in dependencies via cargo's future-compat report immediately, but we could also make it show up just for the local crate first if that is preferred.
try-job: i686-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: test-various
const-eval error: always say in which item the error occurred
I don't see why "is this generic" should make a difference. It may be reasonable to key this on whether the error occurs in a `const fn` that was invoked by a const (making it non-obvious which constant it is) vs inside the body of the const.
r? `@oli-obk`
Simplify and optimize `VecCache`'s `SlotIndex::from_index`
Simplify and optimize `SlotIndex::from_index`
Break out bucket 0 (containing `idx < 4096`) as an early return, which
simplifies the remainder of the function, and allows optimizing the
`checked_ilog2` since it can no longer return `None`.
This reduces the runtime of `vec_cache::tests::slot_index_exhaustive`
(which calls `SlotIndex::from_index` for every `u32`, twice) from ~15.5s
to ~13.3s.
Separately, simplify the test case as well. (The old and new code passes with
the old and new test case.)
---
Noticed because `slot_index_exhaustive` stood out as taking unusually long compared to other tests, so I started investigating what it was doing.
Don't walk into `Certainty::Yes` goals
Don't walk into `Certainty::Yes` goals in the pending obligation finding code, since they will not have been stalled on an infer var anyways
Remove CollectItemTypesVisitor
I always felt like we were very unnecessarily walking the HIR, let's see if perf agrees
There is lots to ~~improve~~ consolidate further here, as we still have 3 item wfchecks:
* check_item (matching on the hir::ItemKind)
* actually doing trait solver based checks (by using HIR spans)
* lower_item (matching on the hir::ItemKind after loading it again??)
* just ensure_ok-ing a bunch of queries
* check_item_type (matching on DefKind)
* some type based checks, mostly ensure_ok-ing a bunch of queries
fixesrust-lang/rust#121429
compiler: Treat ForceWarning as a Warning for diagnostic level
This silences an ICE.
No idea if this is the correct solution though tbh.
Fixesrust-lang/rust#142144
compiler: Sort and doc ExternAbi variants
My personal brainworms found this ordering made the most sense while writing the CanonAbi PR. It is *an* ordering, at least, unlike the current mess. There has been no particular reason for the previous order ever since rust-lang/rust#136901, despite the comment I delete here. I just didn't change it.
Because I feel weird just fussing with variant ordering in the source definition, I also documented a bunch to the best of my ability.
