Merge mir query analysis invocations
r? `@ghost`
same thing as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140854 just a different set of queries
Doing this in general has some bad cache coherence issues because the query caches are laid out in Vec<QueryResult> lists per query where each index refers to a DefId in the same order as we're iterating. Iterating two or more lists at the same time does have cache issues, so I want to poke a bit at it to see if we can't merge just a few of them at a time.
Invoke a query only when it doesn't return immediately anyway
This should cause less query key caching and less dep graph data, hopefully resulting in some perf improvements
Remove manual WF hack
We do not need this hack anymore since we fixed the candidate selection problems with `Sized` bounds. We prefer built-in sized bounds now since #138176, which fixes the only regression this hack was intended to fix.
While this theoretically is broken for some code, for example, when there a param-env bound that shadows an impl or built-in trait, we don't see it in practice and IMO it's not worth the burden of having to maintain this wart in `compare_method_predicate_entailment`.
The code that regresses is, for example:
```rust
trait Bar<'a> {}
trait Foo<'a, T> {
fn method(&self)
where
Self: Bar<'a>;
}
struct W<'a, T>(&'a T)
where
Self: Bar<'a>;
impl<'a, 'b, T> Bar<'a> for W<'b, T> {}
impl<'a, 'b, T> Foo<'a, T> for W<'b, T> {
fn method(&self) {}
}
```
Specifically, I don't believe this is really going to be encountered in practice. For this to fail, there must be a where clause in the *trait method* that would shadow an impl or built-in (non-`Sized`) candidate in the trait, and this shadowing would need to be encountered when solving a nested WF goal from the impl self type.
See #108544 for the original regression. Crater run is clean!
r? lcnr
Including:
- Infer `label {}` and `const` operands.
- Correctly handle unsafe check inside `label {}`.
- Fix an embarrassing parser typo that cause labels to never be part of the AST
Use the new solver in the `impossible_predicates`
The old solver is unsound for many reasons. One of which was weaponized by `@lcnr` in #140212, where the old solver was incompletely considering a dyn vtable method to be impossible and replacing its vtable entry with a null value. This null function could be called post-mono.
The new solver is expected to be less incomplete due to its correct handling of higher-ranked aliases in relate. This PR switches the `impossible_predicates` query to use the new solver, which patches this UB.
r? lcnr
For some reason we had them in some projects, I'm not sure why. But this caused cache priming to appear stuck - because it uses a set of crate IDs for the actual work, but for the number of crates to index it just uses `db.all_crates().len()`.
Stage0 bootstrap update
This PR [follows the release process](https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-tuesday) to update the stage0 compiler.
The only thing of note is 58651d1b31, which was flagged by clippy as a correctness fix. I think allowing that lint in our case makes sense, but it's worth to have a second pair of eyes on it.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Do not remove `super` keyword from `super let`
This is affecting a macro in the standard library:
bc7512ee63/library/core/src/pin.rs (L1945)
I added an exception in 6f6a9a585891d0a2d1114a7a621f35f28f39c0d9, but I'd like to remove it eventually, so opening this in-tree to not block this on the next rustfmt sync.
r? `@calebcartwright` or `@ytmimi`
cg_llvm: Clean up some inline assembly bindings
This PR combines a few loosely-related cleanups to LLVM bindings related to inline assembly. These include:
- Replacing `LLVMRustInlineAsm` with LLVM-C's `LLVMGetInlineAsm`
- Adjusting FFI declarations to avoid the need for explicit `as_c_char_ptr` conversions
- Flattening control flow in `inline_asm_call`
There should be no functional changes.
Remove mono item collection strategy override from -Zprint-mono-items
Previously `-Zprint-mono-items` would override the mono item collection
strategy. When debugging one doesn't want to change the behaviour, so
this was counter productive. Additionally, the produced behaviour was
artificial and might never arise without using the option in the first
place (`-Zprint-mono-items=eager` without `-Clink-dead-code`). Finally,
the option was incorrectly marked as `UNTRACKED`.
Resolve those issues, by turning `-Zprint-mono-items` into a boolean
flag that prints results of mono item collection without changing the
behaviour of mono item collection.
For codegen-units test incorporate `-Zprint-mono-items` flag directly
into compiletest tool.
Test changes are mechanical. `-Zprint-mono-items=lazy` was removed
without additional changes, and `-Zprint-mono-items=eager` was turned
into `-Clink-dead-code`. Linking dead code disables internalization, so
tests have been updated accordingly.
Update miniz_oxide dependency of coverage_dump
This was the final subproject that depended on ```miniz_oxide``` 0.7.x after the rest were when updating the ```backtrace-rs``` dependency in in #140705. Older versions of ```miniz_oxide``` got hit by a [serious](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132636) performance regression in rust 1.82 (which has been worked around in more recent versions of the library) so should really be avoided if possible (granted it only affects compression so not sure if it had much impact in practice here, though there have also been some other performance improvements since .)
This also means no longer having to build two versions of miniz_oxide as everything can now use the same version, and no longer needing to build both ```adler``` and ```adler2```
Async drop fix for async_drop_in_place<T> layout for unspecified T
Fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140423.
Layout of `async_drop_in_place<T>::{closure}` is calculated for unspecified T from dataflow_const_prop `try_make_constant`.
`@oli-obk,` do you think, it may be a better solution to add check like `if !args[0].is_fully_specialized() { return None; }` in `fn async_drop_coroutine_layout`?
And could you, pls, recommend, how to implement `is_fully_specialized()` in a most simple way?
